THE move by Barbados to become the world's newest republic will trigger calls for other Commonwealth countries to follow suit, a campaign group has said.
Anti-monarchy pressure group Republic said the move by the Caribbean country will provoke more debate about the future of the monarchy in the UK.
Graham Smith, the Republic CEO, said it will show Britain - and other countries with a monarch as its head of state - the alternative to the Royal Family.
On Tuesday, the island nation will sever ties with the Queen by declaring itself a Republic on the 55th anniversary of the nation's independence.
READ MORE: Barbados just appointed its first president as it becomes a republic
Its new ceremonial president, Dame Sandra Madon will take over the Queen's duties.
Prime minister Mia Mottley, who spearheaded the transition, wrote in a speech for Mason last year: “The time has come to fully leave our colonial past behind.
"Barbadians want a Barbadian head of state.
“This is the ultimate statement of confidence in who we are and what we are capable of achieving.”
Speaking ahead of the transition, Republic CEO Smith said: "A huge congratulations to Barbados for this historic moment in their nation's story.
"Barbados isn't just doing themselves a favour, but are showing the way for the other fifteen Commonwealth realms.
On Tuesday there will be one less monarchy in the world. #EndTheMonarchy #Barbados pic.twitter.com/iCElg3lUhq
— Republic (@RepublicStaff) November 27, 2021
"We're already hearing that Jamaica's government wants a review of their constitution next year, and the movement in Australia is again picking up momentum.
"Barbados answers one of the most common questions we hear: what's the alternative?
"The alternative is simple, a parliamentary system with a largely ceremonial head of state."
Smith said Barbados has also shown "how simple" it is to change a constitution, and how smooth the transition can be.
He continued: "The Queen is the monarchy for most people. After she dies the future of the institution is in serious jeopardy.
Jamaican PM Andrew Holness has announced that Jamaica's Constitution - much of which is based on British law - will undergo a major review next year. This comes as Barbados is set to remove the Queen as its head of state in a matter of hours. pic.twitter.com/15BaEtlSZG
— Nadine White (@Nadine_Writes) November 29, 2021
"Charles may inherit the throne, but he won't inherit the deference and respect afforded the Queen.
"The transition in Barbados has also triggered calls for slavery reparations and an apology from the royals for their family's part in the slave trade.
"Those calls aren't going away and there's no way the royals come out of that debate without significant damage to their reputation.
"The more debate about the monarchy the better as far as we're concerned here in the UK.
"Because the more people take a closer look the more they start looking for a democratic alternative."
READ MORE: Royal 'climate change hypocrites' billboards roll out across Edinburgh and Glasgow
During a ceremony marking the island nation's transition to a republic, the Prince of Wales will highlight what he says are the shared goals and enduring bonds between Barbados and the UK.
Charles will also tell the nation it is “important” for him to attend the event, being staged in the capital Bridgetown, to “reaffirm those things which do not change” as the major constitutional shift takes place.
During the ceremony in National Heroes Square, Charles is expected to say: “As your constitutional status changes, it was important to me that I should join you to reaffirm those things which do not change.”
He will go on to give examples of the ties that will remain, talking about "the close and trusted partnership between Barbados and the United Kingdom as vital members of the Commonwealth” and “our common determination to defend the values we both cherish and to pursue the goals we share”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel