A 12-MILE zone to regulate dredging and trawling should be brought in around Scotland’s coast to protect marine stocks, SNP members have agreed.
Party activists debated a resolution on the final day of the conference which called for Holyrood agency Marine Scotland to regulate activity along the shoreline to protect biodiversity.
The resolution stated that Scotland’s marine stocks are being “seriously overfished” leading to the marine environment being “destroyed” by dredging and trawling on the sea bed.
It calls for meaningful dialogue with fishermen, conservationists and scientists to “create a viable and sustainable” marine habitat and fishing industry.
READ MORE: Alec Shelbrooke among Tory MPs under fire for refusing to wear face masks
The resolution continued: “Conference therefore resolves to call on Marine Scotland to utilise existing powers to regulate and monitor fishing/potting activities within the 12 mile limit.
“Marine Scotland Executive Agency in charge of fisheries is obliged to follow the policy ser out in the National Marine Plan and Marine (Scotland) 2010 act.”
The motion also calls for the sea to be regarded as a “public asset” to be “regulated and managed fairly”.
Catherine Murphy, who proposed the motion, told delegates that everyone has a stake in the “well being” of the sea.
She continued: “The Scottish Government sets the bar high, but we must do more to achieve our aims.
“Instead of trawl and dredge fishing, destroying the seabed including the nursery environments for juvenile fish, crabs, lobsters, etc, we can have hand dyed scallops, creel caught crab and lobster, so preserving Scotland the brand as a premium product on the world stage.
“Conference, I call on the Scottish Government to stop the chronic destruction of the coastal seabed by immediately reinstating limits to the bottom trawling and dredge fishing in the 1984 act, which has allowed the destruction of the inshore habitat, resulting in reduced fish and crustacean population impacting on the local community biodiversity and sustainability.
READ MORE: SNP conference: Roadmap for 'drastic' emissions drop by 2025
“The sea soothes our souls. It is now time to save the sea.”
Finlay McFarlane, who seconded the motion, told delegates that the “time for change is now” and welcomed the resolution.
He added: “It's a hugely important statement of intent and an acknowledgement of overfishing. “Some in the industry might say, you know, I've trolled the seas for many years and my catch is fine, but the day will come and it won't be.
“It's about supporting and incentivizing sustainable fishing practices.”
Environmentalists have long called for greater curbs on fishing activity within the 12 mile limit, but it has been a controversial issue of debate which has split opinions in the sector.
While the Scottish Fishermen's Federation last year rejected a call for a ban on trawlers within three miles of the shore, the Scottish Creel Fishermen’s Federation has said the sustainable efforts of its members are being hampered by a “poorly regulated minority”.
In 2017, scallop dredges were banned from Loch Carron, Wester Ross, after an endangered reef was damaged.
READ MORE: Omicron: All people aged 18 and over to be offered a Covid booster vaccine
The Scottish Government put in place an urgent Marine Conservation order banning dredgers at the Highland loch for a year, but six months later brought in permanent protections.
The site, which will take decades to recover, was designated a Marine Protected Area.
The resolution passed with 342 votes in favour, with three against.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel