SUPPORTERS cheered as Craig Murray was released from HMP Edinburgh on Tuesday, after being sentenced to eight months in prison for contempt of court.
The former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, who later became a pro-independence blogger, was found in contempt over blogs he wrote during the trial of former first minister Alex Salmond. He has served a little under four months in prison.
Judges determined that the offending blog posts contained details which, if pieced together, could lead readers to identify women who made allegations against Salmond, who was acquitted of all 13 charges including sexual assault and attempted rape in 2020.
READ MORE: Supporters to welcome Craig Murray on his release from jail
At a virtual sentencing earlier this year, Lady Dorrian said Murray knew there were court orders giving the women anonymity and he was “relishing” the potential disclosure of their identities.
Lady Dorrian said Murray deliberately risked “jigsaw identification”, saying: “It appears from the posts and articles that he was in fact relishing the task he set himself, which was essentially to allow the identities of complainers to be discerned – which he thought was in the public interest – in a way which did not attract sanction.”
But supporters of Murray consider his sentence to be political. Outside the prison in Edinburgh, before he was released, his fans held signs reading “#ScotlandJailsJournalists” and “We <3 Craig”.
One supporter, named Irene Campbell, told The National: "Well he's a political prisoner. It's a travesty of justice and I think everyone's just happy that he'll be free to see his family again."
As a heavily bearded Murray left the prison he was reunited with wife Nadira Alieva and their son, who both spoke criticising his imprisonment at the inaugural Alba Party conference shortly into his sentence.
Speaking after being released, Murray told supporters that more than 2000 people had written to him while he was in jail.
He also spoke on the link between poverty, addiction and prison he has observed while in HMP Edinburgh, and touched on the “greenwashing” of COP26.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel