SENIOR clinicians have written to the First Minister to outline their “immense disappointment and frustration” at the way their hospitals are being portrayed in Parliament and in the media.
The 23 doctors also highlight the “untold distress” being inflicted on Scottish families as opposition figures bring up “individual patients … in Parliament without the knowledge of the families concerned”.
The letter follows a series of interventions by Scottish Labour, who have consistently raised concerns about the governance of the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde health board and Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, alleging a culture of "cover up and secrecy".
A statement from NHSGGC said that “previous investigations into such claims, including by the independent review, concluded that there is no culture of organisational bullying”.
READ MORE: Labour urges Nicola Sturgeon to put flagship hospital under ministerial control
It added: “We are very concerned that these allegations persist as we have seen no additional evidence to substantiate any such claims."
In their letter, the senior clinicians say: "We have been, and remain, fully committed to being completely open and transparent in all that we do and we are dismayed that the integrity of our staff has been repeatedly called into question.
"Do we always get everything right when we discuss issues with families? Perhaps not. Do we ever wilfully withhold information from them? Absolutely not.
"We have grave concerns that the continued undermining nature of the current negative headlines will result in an erosion of trust between clinical staff and patients and their families."
The letter comes ahead of a debate in Holyrood, tabled by Scottish Labour, which will call on Parliament to say it has “no confidence in the leadership of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde”.
An amendment tabled by Health Secretary Humza Yousaf - which is likely to pass - will change this motion to instead recognise “the work of frontline NHS staff at QEUH, and across the health service”.
Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, has previously called on the Scottish Government to “back or sack” the NHSGGC leadership, claiming the “ongoing scandal at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital is the greatest of the devolution era”.
It comes amid ongoing controversy about infections at the hospital, with Sarwar claiming these had been linked to more deaths.
He told Nicola Sturgeon that a case of aspergillus - an infection linked to mould - had been discovered in a child cancer patient who was being treated in the same ward at the same time as Andrew Slorance – a senior Scottish Government official who died last year after contracting both coronavirus and the aspergillus infection while being treated for cancer in the QEUH.
Sarwar also said that more recently a child in the paediatric hospital acquired a waterborne infection like the one linked to the death of schoolgirl Milly Main, and had also died.
He said he had been contacted by two clinicians working at the health board, one of whom alleged that by not acting fast enough doctors “could have lost the chance to prevent subsequent infections and deaths”.
The Labour leader refused to confirm the identity of the clinicians, whom he claims fear “retribution”.
Responding at the time, Sturgeon said: “When concerns are raised about the cause of someone’s death, then that has to be properly investigated so that the action that is then taken as a result of that is the right action.”
Accepting “these are serious matters”, she added: “We do not do justice to the families concerned if we simply call for action that is not based on proper investigation, proper scrutiny and proper consideration.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel