GHISLAINE Maxwell’s youngest alleged victim has told a court she flew on disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein’s private plane with the Duke of York and met former president Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort at the age of 14.
The witness, giving evidence under the pseudonym “Jane” at a US federal court in the Southern District of New York on Wednesday, told jurors she does “not believe I have come up with a memory” of being sexually abused by Maxwell.
The 59-year-old British socialite, who was described as “dangerous” during the opening statements of the trial, is accused of preying on vulnerable young girls and luring them to massage rooms to be molested by Epstein between 1994 and 2004.
Jane, who is now an actress in her 40s, told the court on Tuesday she had been summoned to an orgy by Maxwell and Epstein at the age of 14, which had left her “frozen with fear”.
But on Wednesday, the Duke of York was dragged into the sex trafficking trial for the second day in a row as the witness recalled flying with Andrew on Epstein’s plane.
During cross-examination on Wednesday, defence counsel Laura Menninger said: “When you were 14, Epstein took you in a dark green car to Mar-a-Lago and you met Donald Trump there, correct?”
“Correct,” Jane said.
The witness also said she had again associated with Trump at a beauty pageant, where Epstein had given her 2000 dollars for a dress.
Asked if she had cried about only being given 2000 dollars, Jane replied: “That’s ridiculous, I wouldn’t do that.”
Menninger continued: “Do you remember Prince Andrew being on a flight with you?”
“Yes.”
Jane was then asked: “You claim there was a photo of you on Epstein’s desk and you were wearing a bathing suit, correct?”
“Correct,” she said.
The cross examination continued: “You have talked to your family members (about Epstein)?”
“Some of them.”
“You have talked to your ex-boyfriend?”
“Yes,” Jane replied.
On Tuesday, Jane said she did not tell anybody about any abuse because she was “terrified” and “felt gross and ashamed”.
During cross-examination, Menninger asked Jane: “It is true that you do not recall Ghislaine ever touching you?”
“That’s not true,” Jane replied.
Menninger said: “You spoke to the government in December 2019 with your lawyers there and you told them at that time that you were not sure whether Maxwell ever touched you during these encounters.”
“I don’t recall,” the witness replied.
“You told the Government you were not sure if Ghislaine ever kissed you.”
“I don’t recall.”
“You told the Government you had no memory of Ghislaine being present when you claim Epstein engaged in any sexual contact, correct?”
“I don’t recall.”
“As you sit here today, you are not sure you were ever alone in a room with Ghislaine and Epstein, correct?”
“No.”
Jane told the court it was correct to say Maxwell never watched her perform oral sex on Epstein.
Asked if she had come up with a memory of Maxwell being involved in any sexual encounters, Jane said: “I don’t believe I have come up with a memory, no.”
Before day three of her trial, Maxwell entered the courtroom and nodded at her sister Isabel and brother Kevin, sitting in the front row of the public gallery.
Maxwell embraced her counsel a number of times before the beginning of the court session, and took several sips from her water bottle.
The full indictment against her lists six charges: conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts; enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts; conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity; transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity; sex trafficking conspiracy; and sex trafficking of a minor.
The defendant is further alleged to have lied under oath by hiding her participation in Epstein’s offences during a separate civil case.
Maxwell, who has been held in a US jail since her arrest in July last year, denies all charges.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article