‘Lady of the house’ Ghislaine Maxwell told staff of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein not to look in his eyes while they spoke to him, a court has heard.
The British socialite, 59, allegedly told Juan Patricio Alessi to “only speak to Epstein when he asked questions”.
Testifying at a federal court in the Southern District of New York on Thursday, Alessi told jurors he would have to conduct “extensive preparations” when he was told Epstein would be arriving at the Florida house – including putting 100 dollar bills in his cars.
Epstein’s then-girlfriend Maxwell is accused of preying on vulnerable young girls and luring them to massage rooms to be molested by him between 1994 and 2004.
READ MORE: ‘Dangerous’ Ghislaine Maxwell preyed on girls for Jeffrey Epstein to molest, court told
Alessi, who testified he was called John by Maxwell, said he was given “many, many instructions” by the defendant during his time as housekeeper at the Palm Beach house.
Taking to the witness box, he said: “After three years working for him I brought my wife to help me.
“She would stay with me, and there were other girls flying with Mr Epstein and Ms Maxwell to the house.”
Under examination from Assistant United States Attorney Maurene Comey, Mr Alessi said of Maxwell: “I understood she was the lady of the house. She told me she was going to be the lady of the house.”
Asked how his relationship with Epstein had changed while he worked for him, Mr Alessi said: “It went from being cordial to being more just professional.
“Our conversations became less and less and less.”
Questioned on whether he was given instructions on how to speak to Epstein by Maxwell, Alessi said: “Only that I was supposed to speak to Mr Epstein when he asked me questions.
“At the end of my stay, I was told Jeffrey doesn’t like looking in his eyes so don’t look in his eyes, just look at another part of the room and answer him.”
“It was extensive preparations. It was very elaborate,” Mr Alessi said of Epstein’s arrivals in Palm Beach.
“From the cleaning of the house, to change the sheets in his room, changing the sheets in the guest rooms, to the shopping, taking care of the cars, making sure the cars were clean, make sure there were 100 dollar bills in the car.
“The house needed to be immaculate – like a five star hotel.”
The court also heard from clinical and forensic psychologist Dr Lisa Rocchio who told the jury about the five stages of grooming victims.
READ MORE: Prince Andrew's lawyers call on US judge to dismiss sexual abuse case
The full indictment against Maxwell lists six charges: conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts; enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts; conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity; transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity; sex trafficking conspiracy; and sex trafficking of a minor.
The defendant is further alleged to have lied under oath by hiding her participation in Epstein’s offences during a separate civil case.
Epstein was found dead in his cell at a federal jail in Manhattan in August 2019 while he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. The death was ruled a suicide.
Maxwell, who has been held in a US jail since her arrest in July last year, denies all charges.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel