THE Nutcracker, choreographed by Scottish Ballet’s founding artistic director Peter Darrell back in 1973, is a much-loved gem in the repertoire of our national dance company. Given a new lease of life under current artistic director Christopher Hampson, it enjoyed a celebrated revival in 2014.
Now, following the Covid-enforced postponement of last year’s production, the show begins a six-city tour (taking in Glasgow, Aberdeen, Inverness, Newcastle and Belfast) at Edinburgh’s splendid Festival Theatre. Whilst continuity, both with Darrell’s original choreography and Hampson’s re-envisioning of it, is very much to the fore in this latest staging, eagle-eyed ballet lovers will notice some new innovations.
For a start, the role of the magician Drosselmeyer has been feminised, and, as the late Barry Norman might have said, why not? On opening night Madeline Squire played the character with an energetic flair that defied any traditionalist insistence that the role is, somehow, inherently masculine.
Even more significantly – and as is explained in an interesting article in the show’s programme by my fellow critic Katie Goh – increasing sensitivity towards cultural representation has led Scottish Ballet to re-appraise the famous scene in Act 2 in which characters from various parts of the world dance for Clara (the little girl whose dream the ballet is).
READ MORE: Alladin in Glasgow: A pantomime classic with plenty of oomph in its tank
In the case of the problematic Chinese Tea Dance, for instance, Hampson has taken on board the views of dancer and activist Phil Chan (who advised New York City Ballet on its staging of The Nutcracker).
In doing so, he has sought to ensure that the representation of Chinese culture – both in costume and in physical gesture – is affirmative, rather than derogatory. Let the Nadine Dorries-style culture warriors of this world reach for their divisive, one-dimensional epithets about “wokeness” and “political correctness”.
Anyone blessed with a sense of decency and proportion will agree with Hampson that these timely (indeed, overdue) innovations are part of the evolution of ballet as an art form. If our theatres are to be welcoming places for everyone, it is imperative that representations of people’s cultures be positive, rather than being steeped in racial stereotypes.
That said, there are problems of cultural sensitivity in many classical art works, including The Nutcracker, that cannot be so easily fixed. Take, for example, the music Tchaikovsky wrote to accompany the Arabian Dance.
Beautiful though it is, the music betrays an Orientalist European fascination with the Arab world as a mysterious conundrum. Better, I suggest, to understand this aspect of Tchaikovsky’s score in its historical and cultural context than to consider removing it.
READ MORE: Here's what Scottish theatre has to offer for the rest of 2021
Nonetheless, Hampson’s changes have enhanced the piece, adding to, not detracting from, its general splendour. As in 2014, this rendering of Darrell’s work is a gorgeous Christmas creation.
Indeed, the production isn’t so “woke” that it can’t revel in the conspicuous consumption of the 19th- century, bourgeois festivities that make up most of Act 1. The entire company is on wonderful display as splendidly attired, copiously moustached army officers dance with expensively frocked ladies.
In Act 2 Marge Hendrick and Evan Loudon are the very image of traditional ballet in the all-important roles of the Sugar Plum Fairy and the Nutcracker Prince. Surrounded by a sky full of Christmas baubles, watched by Clara (tremendous child star Caoimhe Fisher) and a pair of charmingly costumed monkeys, they dance with subtle beauty and impressive physicality to some of the most famous pieces of music in Tchaikovsky’s remarkable oeuvre.
Once again, Hampson has rendered Darrell’s famous Nutcracker as the most sumptuous and exhilarating of festive ballets.
Touring until February 12: scottishballet.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here