DOMINIC Raab has sown confusion about the number of Covid patients in hospital admitted with the Omicron variant.
The Deputy Prime Minister was doing broadcast interviews on Tuesday morning when he was asked on three separate channels about how the number of Omicron patients in England and gave a different answer to all three.
It is understood that the latest figure for the number of people in hospital in England with the Omicron variant is 10, after Raab wrongly suggested it was 250 to Sky News and then said it was nine to BBC.
READ MORE: Limiting household mixing among possible restrictions in FM's Covid update
He was challenged by Good Morning Britain's Adil Ray on the actual figure who said: "If you don't know the basics, how can we respond to it?"
Raab said: “It’s 10 at the moment.”
After being interrupted by Ray, Raab added: “Can I answer the question? I understand you like ranting at your politicians in the morning but can I answer the question because it’s a fair challenge and I want to answer it?
“First of all, I misheard one of the questions around whether it was hospitalisations of Omicron-related patients or more generally, but the figures are: one death from Omicron, 10 in hospital, and I can tell you the latest daily hospitalisations run at 900.”
'You've done two interviews this morning, you were asked a simple question, how many people are in hospital? You told Sky News 250 people and you told BBC Breakfast 9.'
— Good Morning Britain (@GMB) December 14, 2021
Dominic Raab clarifies 10 people are in hospital with Omicron, after getting the numbers wrong. pic.twitter.com/MYccrkXIsN
Raab's three different figures were criticised by SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford who tweeted: "This is extraordinary all Governments are going to have to make decisions to control the spread of the virus. Knowing the difference between nine and 250 in hospital is pretty fundamental.
"@DominicRaab showing the same failure to be over the detail as his boss @BorisJohnson."
This is extraordinary all Governments are going to have to make decisions to control the spread of the virus. Knowing the difference between 9 and 250 in hospital is pretty fundamental. @DominicRaab showing the same failure to be over the detail as his boss @BorisJohnson https://t.co/5bILtW7dgP
— Ian Blackford (@Ianblackford_MP) December 14, 2021
During media interviews, Raab also criticised Tory MP Marcus Fysh’s comparison of coronavirus health passes to Nazi atrocities as “crass”.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “I don’t like that kind of language and I don’t think it’s appropriate.”
He said he wants “to play the issue not the individuals”, but added: “Actually, I don’t think comparing what we are trying to achieve to an authoritarian or Nazi regime is quite right. I think a lot of people find that crass.”
READ MORE: Dominic Raab to announce reforms to strengthen 'typically British' rights
Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a move to the UK Government's Plan B measures to tackle the virus but more than 70 MPs plan to vote against the measures.
It is reported that up to 10 ministerial aides could resign to oppose the controls, with up to four votes on the measures expected to take place on Tuesday evening.
They are still expected to be passed as Labour will be voting with the Government to back the measures with leader Keir Starmer saying it was their “patriotic duty”.
READ MORE: What time is Nicola Sturgeon's Covid update today and what will it say?
Under the new measures from Wednesday, in England NHS Covid passes will be required for entry to indoor venues containing more than 500 people, unseated outdoor venues with more than 4000 people, and any venue with more than 10,000 people.
Many Tory backbenchers oppose the requirement for so-called vaccine passports as a serious infringement of people’s civil liberties.
They also oppose the Covid pass, which involves showing full vaccination or a recent negative test for the virus, on the same grounds.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel