THE cost of litigation relating to the Rangers wrongful prosecution scandal have reached almost £40 million, Scottish Government accounts have shown.
Compensation payments worth millions have been made after several people involved in the administration and acquisition of the football club were wrongly prosecuted.
Administrators David Whitehouse and Paul Clark were arrested in 2014, though the Crown Office later dropped charges and admitted their prosecutions were “malicious”.
The Lord Advocate also admitted Charles Green and Imran Ahmad should never have been prosecuted, with Green receiving more than £6 million in compensation plus legal costs.
READ MORE: Former Rangers chief wins more than £6m in malicious prosecution case
The Scottish Government’s consolidated accounts, released earlier this week, say total costs were £39.9M.
The cost item is described as “involvement with civil litigation brought against the Lord Advocate by individuals prosecuted in connection with the acquisition and administration of Rangers Football Club”.
The Scottish Government has promised an inquiry into the wrongful prosecutions once outstanding legal proceedings have concluded.
Reporting on the latest costs on Saturday, the Daily Record said previous estimates had been £35M.
Conservative MSP Russell Findlay told the newspaper: “It’s outrageous that taxpayers continue to be hit in the pocket by the Rangers malicious prosecutions scandal.
“The SNP Government needs to be open and honest about how many millions of pounds have been lost from public funds.
“While ministers agreed to our calls for a public inquiry, they can’t use that as an excuse to keep people in the dark in the meantime, while the bill continues to spiral.”
A spokesman for the Crown Office said: “The previous Lord Advocate committed the Crown to support a judge-led inquiry once all litigation is over and apologised for the cost to the public purse.
“There are long-standing and robust processes in place to minimise the possibility that wrongful prosecutions are brought.
“We have strengthened these through case management panels which provide additional scrutiny and direction from senior prosecutors.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “The entry in the Scottish Government accounts reflects the total costs arising relating to the civil litigation associated with certain individuals associated with Rangers FC.
“The costs arising in respect of these cases has not been met from the COPFS (Crown Office) resource allocation.
“The overall budget is managed across the Scottish Government and, as happens every year, any overall funding changes required to support expenditure are confirmed as part of budget revisions and appears in the Scottish Government accounts at the appropriate time.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel