A SCOTTISH MP has questioned the Prime Minister’s memory over “forgotten” promises in an excoriating letter to a senior minister.
Anne McLaughlin slams Boris Johnson in a highly critical letter to Safe and Legal Migration Minister Kevin Foster.
In it, the Glasgow North East politician – the SNP’s Westminster spokesperson for justice and immigration – quotes Johnson’s own words over the UK’s responsibility to the bodyguards, security staff and officials employed to aid British armed forces and authorities for more than a decade before the chaotic withdrawal in August.
Announcing his government’s “Operation Warm Welcome” for Afghan nationals at the end of August, Johnson said: “I am determined that we welcome them with open arms and that my government puts in place the support they need to rebuild their lives. We will never forget the brave sacrifice made by Afghans who chose to work with us, at great risk to themselves.”
READ MORE: Boris Johnson 'prioritised pets over people' in Afghanistan evacuation
But this week eligibility for a key resettlement scheme for these staff was quietly reduced by the Home Office.
As of 4pm last Tuesday, fewer people at risk of persecution from the Taliban over their involvement with western authorities are covered by the criteria. This is being applied retrospectively and so covers any application decided after that point, regardless of when it was submitted.
Interpreters and those who were employed in an exposed role by a UK Government department must now prove, as a result of public recognition for their employment, that their safety is at risk. Others have to show a substantive positive contribution to specific military or national security work and that they face an elevated death or injury risk, or hold sensitive information.
Minnie Rahman, interim chief executive of the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, has accused the UK Government of having “slammed the door” on people.
Citing Johnson’s words, McLaughlin told Foster: “I am not sure if it has slipped your memory that the Prime Minister said this, if you disagree with him or if the Prime Minister has now forgotten what he said.
“This change of rules means there is no longer a welcome for people who gave service to the UK, something which is particularly stark at Christmas when the Nativity is, in part, a story about refuge and welcome.”
She went on: “I would urge you and the Government to think again about what you are doing to people.
“I also want to draw your attention to the shocking decision that these changes apply to all applications decided after 16:00 on December 14 2021 regardless of when an application was submitted.
“People who made applications prior to this time and date have made decisions in their lives since their application because they thought that they would have their applications accepted by the UK, even if it took some time.
READ MORE: 'If I go out, the Taliban will kill me... if I stay at home, poverty will'
"They have been patiently waiting whilst living in desperate situations, often living in hiding and they have been subjected to torture, intimidation and imprisonment by the Taliban because they supported the UK. It’s morally unacceptable to pull the rug out from under their feet at this late stage.”
The promised Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme, for some of those who aren’t eligible for Arap, has yet to open and MPs still don’t know when this will happen. McLaughlin urged Foster to increase the 20,000 places set to be offered in light of the changes to the Arap scheme.
The UK Government says the August evacuation was the “biggest and fastest” emergency response of its kind in recent history, “helping over 15,000 people to safety from Afghanistan who we are continuing to support”.
It states: “We know that there are many left in difficult circumstances, which is why we are establishing the Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme (ACRS). This will be one of the most generous schemes in our country’s history and will give up to 20,000 further people at risk a new life in the UK.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel