PRO-EU comments have come back to haunt Foreign Secretary Liz Truss after she was tasked with overseeing the UK’s relations with the EU post-Brexit.
Liz Truss, who voted Remain, has taken over the role after Brexit minister Lord Frost resigned on Saturday, citing fears over the UK Government’s “direction of travel”.
Despite being a staunchly pro-EU advocate before the 2016 Brexit referendum, the Tory minister pivoted to a strongly pro-Brexit stance after the vote.
If this isn't the most retweeted pic on twitter tonight ....we're really not doing our job #LizTruss pic.twitter.com/FPiros4DRD
— Con O'Neill (@cononeilluk) December 19, 2021
Now, past comments have been dug up that show just how pro-EU Truss was.
READ MORE: Scottish whisky and salmon exports see major blow amid 'harsh reality of Brexit'
Speaking in 2016, the Tory MP said she championed Britain staying inside the EU to protect her daughter’s future.
She said: “I don’t want my daughters to grow up in a world where they need a visa or permit to work in Europe; or where they are hampered from growing a business because of extortionate call costs and barriers to trade.”
She continued: “Every parent wants their children to grow up in a healthy environment with clean water, fresh air and thriving natural wonders. Being part of the EU helps protect these precious resources and spaces.”
Leave cannot name one country we would get a better trade deal with if we left the EU.#BBCDebate
— Liz Truss (@trussliz) June 21, 2016
In the run-up to the 2016 vote, Truss tweeted: “Leave cannot name one country we would get a better trade deal with if we left the EU."
She would later move on to become the UK’s Foreign Secretary, striking post-Brexit trade deals with other countries.
Truss has been criticised by the SNP for her trade deals, being accused of allowing a “race to the bottom” in standards after she reportedly blocked post-Brexit plans for the UK to ban imports made to low animal welfare standards.
At the time, a UK Government spokesperson said Britain remains a “global leader in animal welfare”.
Making Brexit work is now the preserve of Liz Truss, who was vehemently against it until the other side won, and who has struggled to secure any trade deal that isn’t either a replica of what we already had, or slightly worse for the UK than the other country. What can go wrong.
— Brendan May (@bmay) December 19, 2021
There have also been concerns raised over how the UK’s trade deal with Australia could impact Scottish farmers.
There are fears about the impact of importing beef and lamb from the country, and the effect this will have on farmers and crofters in Scotland and Wales.
Truss defended the agreement at the time, saying markets outside of the EU is “where Scotland’s opportunities lie”.
When Liz Truss was in the Lib Dems, I was more Eurosceptic than she was. Just saying…😇
— Tim Farron (@timfarron) December 19, 2021
Commenting, the SNP’s foreign affairs spokesperson Alyn Smith MP: "It is in everyone’s interests for the UK to have as close a relationship to the EU as possible, and given her previous views on this, perhaps there is more hope for her than the unlamented Lord Frost who was first and foremost an ideologue.
READ MORE: Specialist lighting firm bemoans impact of Brexit on Scottish businesses
"But it's a pity Liz Truss didn't remember her own words when she was negotiating her Trade Deals, which have undermined standards, agriculture and businesses. I am urging her to bear them in mind now as she looks to the UK's future relationship with the EU.
"Her first test will be that she absolutely must take a different approach to her predecessor and de-escalate the rhetoric around the Northern Ireland protocol.
"However, based on the Trade Deals she has negotiated after Brexit and her inability to recognise the damage her party's hard Brexit deal has done to Scotland, I don't hold out much hope that she will."
The UK Government has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel