BORIS Johnson is poised to decide on whether to introduce new Covid-19 restrictions in England as new rules come into force in other parts of the UK.
The Prime Minister is due to be presented with the latest data on Monday as ministers debate strategies to stem the spread of the Omicron variant.
New measures have already come into force in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland but Conservative ministers have so far swerved new rules in England, instead hoping warnings would encourage people to self-police their own behaviour and cut down on social contacts.
The Prime Minister is expected to be briefed by chief medical officer for England Professor Chris Whitty and chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance.
If the figures are positive, Johnson could be persuaded to stick to lighter touch measures introduced under Plan B, potentially with some extra words of guidance.
However, if cases were beginning to put unsustainable pressure on the NHS, the PM may feel the need to intervene with more stringent restrictions.
The Times reported that in whichever scenario, however, weddings and funerals would be exempt from any new rules.
The debate has led to a split in the Cabinet, with ministers briefing against each other in the press.
On Sunday, Tory insiders urged the Prime Minister not to listen to Michael Gove, who was branded a "dangerous force" because he's pushing for more lockdown measures.
One MP said that Gove makes Johnson "feel comfortable" and he believes that Gove is "the one who delivers".
An ally of Gove rejected the criticism in the Mail on Sunday, saying: "Yes Boris speaks to Michael – because he’s the most effective Cabinet Minister. So what?
"But Michael is not seeing the data, he’s not in the quad [of senior ministers]. There is a limit to what he can do on this."
READ MORE: Tories tell Boris Johnson not to listen to 'dangerous force' Michael Gove
It comes as the latest NHS England figures showed that more than 10,000 patients waited 12 hours before being admitted to hospital in November, up from 2148 the same time last year.
While a record number of NHS trusts recorded patients had waited nearly 24 hours between arriving at hospital by ambulance and being assessed.
Data from NHS England for October 2021 records the longest waits between arriving at A&E and an initial assessment.
And almost one-third of all trusts recorded a longest wait of between 23 and 24 hours. Some 23 trusts reported the longest wait for an assessment was 1,439 mins, just one minute short of 24 hours.
Labour’s shadow health secretary Wes Streeting said: “24 hours in A&E isn’t just a TV show, it’s now what patients are forced to go through under the Tories.”
Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said: “Health leaders are responding to the pressures that increasing numbers of hospital admissions, and increasing levels of staff absence, are already placing on frontline services. Now is the time for the Government to be clear on what action it needs to take to get a grip on the situation.”
Meanwhile, The Daily Telegraph reported schools were drawing up plans to send whole year groups home for remote learning if staff shortages due to Omicron hit after the Christmas holidays.
It is understood school closures are not being considered by ministers for January.
A source close to Education Secretary Nadhim Zahawi said: “The PM and Nadhim are fully committed to keeping schools open and there’s a shared commitment across Government to do so.
“Education is a top priority and school closures are not something being considered.”
But Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, told the Telegraph, headteachers were “hoping for the best but planning for the worst”.
He said: “If you have a fixed pool available of those who can teach young people, then the only final resort schools and colleges have is to start thinking about the certain year groups that should be prioritised in the short term.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel