A PANEL of Conservative members have offered their views on who should be the party’s next leader amid ongoing trouble for Boris Johnson.
Johnson’s popularity has rapidly declined in recent months following the Owen Paterson scandal, multiple reports of Downing Street parties held while Covid restrictions were in place, endless headlines about Tory sleaze and internal party rows over high taxes and public health measures.
Conservative backbenchers are feeling rebellious and some have reportedly sent letters of no-confidence in to the 1922 Committee. After a disastrous by-election result in North Shropshire, where a huge Tory majority collapsed in a LibDem victory, MP Sir Roger Gale painted a stark picture.
“One more strike and he’s out,” he commented.
Amid this backdrop, Tory leadership hopefuls are reportedly circling and awaiting their opportunity to strike.
Earlier in December, it was reported that supporters of Chancellor Rishi Sunak are canvassing support in case “things fall down” – and sources claimed Foreign Secretary Liz Truss was trying to boost her own position by holding “drinks parties” for backbenchers.
One ally of Sunak said it was “the first I’ve heard” about the reports, and a spokesperson for Truss described the allegations as “total and utter rubbish”.
But whether Truss and Sunak are actively trying to boost their profiles or not doesn’t matter to party members, who are very supportive of either potential candidate taking over from Johnson.
Every few months Conservative Home asks a panel of 786 Tory members who should be the next leader – and since August, Truss’s chances have seen a boost.
READ MORE: REVEALED: ‘Grotesque’ £1m claimed by Scottish peers during pandemic
Truss, former international trade secretary credited with securing Brexit deals, received 23.03% of the vote – leading Sunak by around three points. Her score was up from 12.08% in the last survey.
The Chancellor was on 20.48%, down from 31.07% in August. Both are far ahead of fellow potential candidates.
In third place is Penny Mordaunt (8.91%), fourth is former European Research Group chair Steve Baker (8.27%) and fifth is ex-health secretary Jeremy Hunt (7.76%).
The list continues with Tom Tugendhat (5.47%), Sajid Javid (5.22%), Michael Gove, (4.20%), Jacob Rees Mogg (3.56%), Kemi Badenoch (2.42%), Dominic Raab (2.29%), Priti Patel (1.91%), Graham Brady (1.27%), Mark Harper (0.89%) and Anne Marie-Trevelyan (0.38%).
Analysis from Conservative Home’s Paul Goodman sees speculation over why Truss’s lead is not larger.
“Some members of the panel don’t believe that a Truss leadership would necessarily deliver lower taxes, or distrust her Remain past, or view her as an unproven quality as a holder of a great office of state,” he suggests.
He goes on to note: “Both Truss and Sunak are credible potential future leaders, and so one shouldn’t be surprised if support divides more or less evenly between them.”
Even if Johnson were to resign, his replacement would not be solely selected by members. The first round of a leadership election sees Tory MPs given a say, so any potential candidate would need to be popular within the parliamentary party to get to the membership stage.
READ MORE: Which Scottish peers claimed the most during Covid-19 crisis?
Speaking on Boxing Day, Labour chief Sir Keir Starmer discussed rumours over who could take over from Johnson in the future.
In an interview with The Independent, Sir Keir said there was “no plan for the future” under the Tories.
He told the newspaper: “I don’t care who they put up… we will take on whoever is the Tory leader.
“Whoever the leader is, whether it’s (Boris) Johnson or his successor… it is clear that we’ve already had 11, going on 12, years of Tory government, and it’s been a complete failure on any terms.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel