THE latest twist in Prince Andrew’s legal battle with Virginia Giuffre - the woman who alleges that he had sex with her while she was a minor - may be near after US judges ordered the release of a settlement agreement between Giuffre and Jeffrey Epstein.
Epstein, a convicted sex offender who died in custody in 2019, reached a settlement agreement with Giuffre in 2009. According to Andrew’s lawyers, this agreement saw Giuffre agree not to sue anyone else linked to Epstein after she settled her damages claim against him.
The prince's lawyer, Andrew Brettler, has said that the settlement releases the Duke of York from any liability as it covered “royalty”.
However, Giuffre's lawyer, David Boies, said the settlement applied "at most" to people involved in underlying litigation in Florida, where Epstein had a home, and that Prince Andrew should not use it as a "get out of jail free card”.
In a joint order on Wednesday, US District Judges Lewis Kaplan and Loretta Preska in Manhattan ordered the agreement's release on or about January 3, 2022, finding no reason to keep it under seal.
The text of the agreement will have a direct impact on the Duke of York’s case.
Giuffre’s lawsuit accuses Prince Andrew of forcing her to have sex when she was under 18 at the London home of former Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, and abusing her at two of Epstein's homes.
The Duke of York has denied all of the allegations and has not been charged with any crimes. Giuffre is seeking unspecified damages.
On Wednesday, Maxwell was found guilty of several charges linked to the sex trafficking of minors and is facing spending the rest of her life in prison.
Prince Andrew’s lawyers have also previously tried to get the case against him thrown out as Giuffre is “domiciled in Australia”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel