GIVING Tony Blair a knighthood is "the right thing to do", the Labour Speaker of the House of Commons says.
There's been a fierce backlash against the former prime minister's inclusion in the New Year Honours list.
Parents of military personnel killed after Blair ordered the deployment of UK troops in the US-led invasion of Iraq are amongst those to hit out at the decision to appoint him a Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, which is the oldest and most senior British Order of Chivalry.
Made by the Queen, the designation has been given to ex-PMs, with John Major the last to receive it.
A petition on the change.org platform calling on Blair to be stripped of the honour is nearing 200,000 signatures. However, more than one such petition exists, such is the scale of the backlash.
But speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Hoyle defended the knighthood, saying all former prime ministers should get it.
READ MORE: Grieving families label Blair as ‘worst terrorist’ as Chilcot finally delivers his report
He stated: "Whatever people might think, it is one of the toughest jobs in the world and I think it is respectful and it is the right thing to do, whether it is to Tony Blair or to David Cameron. They should all be offered that knighthood when they finish as prime minister.
"I would say if you've been prime minister of this country, I do believe the country should recognise the service they've given.
"It is not about politics, it is about the position they have held in this country. It's about the position and it's the respect that we show to those people who've led this country.
"And I think it's a fitting tribute to the job they've carried out."
Blair held office from 1997 to 2007. He was preceded by Major and followed by Gordon Brown.
Appointments to the Garter are in the Queen's gift and are typically announced on St George's Day in April. However, the monarch can pick any other point to do so. The Garter recognises outstanding public service and achievement and dates back to the reign of Edward III in 1348.
READ MORE: What secret Cabinet Office files reveal about the story of devolution
Blair has described it as an "immense honour", stating: "It was a great privilege to serve as prime minister and I would like to thank all those who served alongside me, in politics, public service and all parts of our society, for their dedication and commitment to our country."
In 2016, the long-delayed Chilcot Report into the Iraq war found that Blair's government "chose to join the invasion... before the peaceful options for disarmament had been exhausted". Adding: "Military action at that time was not a last resort."
It also found that Blair had exaggerated the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's regime while making the case for military action to both MPs and the public in the build-up to the invasion in 2002 and 2003 and relying more on his own judgement than military intelligence.
In a memo to then-US president George W Bush before UN weapons inspectors had even completed their work, Blair pledged: "I will be with you, whatever."
After the findings were published, Blair gave a two-hour press conference in which he sought to defend his actions, stating: "I believe we made the right decision and the world is better and safer."
But critics signing the change.org petition have called him a "war criminal", despite the fact that no prosecution has been led against him.
READ MORE: Farmer for Yes co-founder hits out at secret threat to 'do the dirty' on farmers
One wrote: "Tony Blair should be prosecuted, not knighted. Someone like this being honoured shows how corrupt and vile the system is."
Another said: "A war criminal with the blood of countless innocent on his hands. It proves time for this 'elitist' handing out of 'honours' be done away with."
A third posted: "If it's tradition that former PMs get a knighthood, then high time that tradition gets binned as so many others have recently. No way should this self-centred, egotist be knighted."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel