SUGGESTIONS that mass gatherings could be banned until April have been dampened down by Scotland’s national clinical director after he said the “jury is somewhat out” on whether Edinburgh’s cancelled Hogmanay celebrations could be held in April instead.
Amid the rapid spread of the Omicron Covid variant, the Scottish Government limited events to 100 people standing indoors, 200 people sitting indoors and 500 people outdoors.
This led to a number of major events, including the capital city’s famous New Year party, being called off.
READ MORE: Who and what will be making the political headlines in 2022?
The measure was put in place for three weeks, but a suggestion from Jason Leitch that restrictions could be in place for longer than that prompted backlash on Sunday.
Speaking to the BBC on the idea of rescheduling the Hogmanay celebrations for the spring, Leitch commented: “I like an Edinburgh night out, like any other person in Scotland. I certainly look forward to next year’s Hogmanay, but whether we could bring that forward to April or not, I think the jury is somewhat out.”
He later criticised a headline suggesting all large public gatherings could be forbidden until the spring, responding on Twitter: "For those responding angrily because of this headline from @thetimesscot please listen to the interview on Radio 4 at 1.10 today and hear what I ACTUALLY said, then maybe be kinder. I was asked if I thought Edinburgh could have Hogmanay in April!!!!”
READ MORE: Keeping schools open is 'absolute priority' as students urged to test before return
Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon is due to give an update on the current restrictions on January 11, according to the Scottish Parliament’s website.
This date will mark the three-week review of the rules, but Leitch has previously warned that restrictions could change before then.
He commented: “We’ll give the best advice we can but there is an official review, a legal review, every three weeks with those restrictions but that doesn’t mean things can’t go up or down in the middle weeks.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel