TONY Blair’s knighthood has caused something of a splash.
While more than half a million Brits have signed a petition to have it taken off him, establishment Labour politicians like Keir Starmer and speaker Lindsay Hoyle say the opposite.
Among the stooshie, a BBC reporter shared The National’s December 4 front page on Twitter. It carried the story of the confusion over who exactly holds responsibility for reviewing Blair’s knighthood.
Quoting the headline, the reporter wrote: “Tuesday’s NATIONAL: ‘Who Can Strip Tony Blair Of His Knighthood?’”
Adam Boulton - who recently stepped back from Sky News - didn’t take too kindly to a Scottish paper having the gall to report on the outrage around Blair’s honour.
“You mean the Prime Minister who gave Scotland back its Parliament”, Boulton wrote.
You mean the Prime Minister who gave Scotland back its Parliament https://t.co/Sj1JGKFNTO
— Adam Boulton (@adamboultonSKY) January 3, 2022
The news that Blair “gave” Scotland Holyrood will come as some news to the some 74% of people who voted to make it happen.
The SNP’s Westminster leader Ian Blackford wrote: “The people in Scotland voted in a referendum for a Scots Parliament, Tony Blair most certainly did not give it back.
“The principle was based on the constitutional convention and the sovereignty of the people of Scotland. Self determination is a right, not the privilege of any PM.”
The people in Scotland voted in a referendum for a Scots Parliament, Tony Blair most certainly did not give it back. The principle was based on the constitutional convention and the sovereignty of the people of Scotland. Self determination is a right not the privilege of any PM. https://t.co/hziiSi0IDI
— Ian Blackford (@Ianblackford_MP) January 3, 2022
Blackford wasn’t alone in condemning the statement that Blair “gave” Scotland anything.
“‘Gave’?? Used in this sense, the word smacks of ownership and imperialism. The mindset of Unionists,” Twitter user Paul Kelly commented.
“Come on Scots. Get those forelocks tugged. What an embarrassing and self revelatory comment,” a Sean McPartlin added.
READ MORE: Gerry Hassan: The Queen’s jubilee is the time to have debate on democracy
This might come as some surprise to Boulton, but it’s not only the rebellious Scots who will have been signing that petition. People all over the UK are angry at the honour.
What may not come as a surprise is Boulton’s close links to Blair. In fact, his wife Anji Hunter has known the former prime minister since he was just 15.
During Blair’s time in Downing Street, Hunter was known as his closest and most influential aide.
In 2002, The Telegraph reported: “Ever since he became leader of the Labour party in 1994, the so-called ‘details Queen’ rarely left Mr Blair's side, accompanying him on official trips, running his office and even choosing his ties.”
So why Boulton would have any skin in the game when it comes to defending Tony Blair is beyond us.
To be fair the broadcaster - who stepped down from Sky News at the end of 2021 - did proceed to climb down a little.
Replying to a Steve Kaney who had written “Didn’t realise it was his to give back. Interesting”, Boulton wrote: “Artsy! Delivered the circumstances which gave Scotland back its Parliament - OK. Wouldn’t have happened without his leadership.”
He later clarified that he had meant to start that tweet with the word “arsy”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel