THE Scottish Government has hit back at claims John Swinney used “misleading” Covid data and said they are “totally unfounded”.
The Deptuty First Minister, speaking on BBC Radio Scotland on Tuesday, suggested Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures showing one in 40 Scots were infected compared to one in 25 in England were “the strongest evidence that the measures taken in Scotland are protecting the population from Covid”.
Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross called the use of the statistics “misleading” after the First Minister’s Covid-19 update on Wednesday, and claimed Swinney used them to make a “petty political point”.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon defended her Deputy and Covid Recovery Secretary in her response, stating that he was using the most recent data available at the time.
READ MORE: Margaret Ferrier to stand trial accused of Covid breaches
And, on Thursday, Scottish Labour’s Jackie Baillie reported Swinney to the UK Statistics Authority, writing she was “deeply concerned” to hear the statistics allegedly being misrepresented.
However, the Scottish Government has hit back at the suggestions and said Swinney was making an “entirely valid point”.
The latest updated ONS figures were released on Wednesday, which estimated around one in 20 people in Scotland had the virus, compared to around one in 15 in England, one in 20 in Wales, and one in 25 in Northern Ireland.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “These claims are totally unfounded. Prior to Boxing Day there were already substantial differences in COVID protections between Scotland and England – most importantly on wearing face coverings.
“The Deputy First Minister made the entirely valid point that the different approach we are taking in Scotland is helping protect the population from the virus, using the latest available ONS data published at the time.
“This point is backed up by the latest ONS data published yesterday, which estimates around 1 in 15 people in England tested positive for COVID in the week ending 31 December, compared to 1 in 20 in Scotland.
“As the First Minister made clear yesterday, it is entirely right that Public Health Scotland (PHS) is given time to ensure the data used to differentiate those in hospital because of Covid from those who are in hospital with Covid is robust, and latest analysis from that work will be available in the PHS COVID Weekly Report tomorrow.”
READ MORE: Tory minister urges people to sing God Save the Queen more
We previously told how Scottish Labour’s Baillie had reported Swinney to the statistics authority.
In the letter to the watchdog’s chairman Sir David Norgrove, Baillie wrote: “The correct use of statistics and data is vital to encourage public confidence, rather than the deliberate spin deployed by the Deputy First Minister.”
Speaking about her decision to report Swinney, Baillie added: “Public trust in the actions of the Scottish Government is of paramount importance, but it risks being eroded due to selective and erroneous use of statistics by senior figures such as Mr Swinney.
Baillie reported Swinney to the UK Statistics Authority
“The Scottish Government has a duty to present the people of Scotland with the facts as they are, not as the Government would wish them to be.”
On Tuesday, Sturgeon defended Swinney as using the most up to date data from the ONS.
She said: “I cited in my statement today data that as I understand it that has been published while I’ve been speaking, that is a week more up to date – there will always be a lag in it – that I think will still show that one in 20, though very, very high, is still lower certainly than in England.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf vents 'frustration' at England-only travel rule changes after UK talks
“But these things are not a competition.
“We just all have to take the decisions and judgments that we think are best to try to navigate the safest possible course through that.”
It comes as the number of positive Covid cases recorded in Scotland passed one million.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel