CHANNEL 5’s head of programming has rejected calls from ministers for more “distinctively British” TV shows, arguing their schedule is “not Government-led” and embraces a wide range of viewers.
Ben Frow questioned plans to make it a legal requirement for public broadcasters to preserve programmes that “could only have been made in the United Kingdom”.
He told The Times: “I don’t really know what the Government meant. My job is to look at the schedule, make sure there’s a nice variety and try to second guess the audience.
“I am viewer-led, I am not Government-led when it comes to creative ideas.”
READ MORE: SNP figures 'show Westminster short-changes Scotland by billions'
The Government proposals, announced by then media minister John Whittingdale in September, have been criticised by actor David Tennant, who suggested they were an attempt to push for more politically favourable programming.
Pointing to high viewing figures from different areas across the UK, including Yorkshire, the Midlands and Scotland, Frow said Channel 5 is “of the people, for the people”.
READ MORE: Guido Fawkes SNP 'fact check' gets fact checked - and found to be wrong
“We’re not highfalutin, we’re not snooty, we don’t look down on our audience, we’re not patronising,” he said.
Frow said other channels including the BBC and Channel 4 had started trying to target younger audiences, but his strategy is to appeal to “as many people as possible”.
It comes after ministers backed calls for God Save The Queen to be played more frequently by the BBC and other public broadcasters.
Andrew Rosindell, Conservative MP for Romford, told the Commons that airing the national anthem would provide a “great sense of unity and pride”, and Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries described the suggestion as “fantastic”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel