STORM Arwen will help Scotland meet its climate change targets despite flattening and damaging eight million trees across the country, the Sunday National has been told.
Rather than be a complete disaster for the forestry sector, the November storm has presented an opportunity to drive forward resilience and species diversity, according to Scottish Forestry’s head of operational delivery, Doug Howieson.
Woodland cover in Scotland is currently 19% with the Scottish Government aiming to increase this to 21% by 2032.
“We are well on track to achieve that and Storm Arwen does not deplete it in any way because we will be replanting and will structure the forests to make sure we have more diversity in terms of species and age,” he said. “That will make the woodlands more resilient to storms and will help us in our climate change targets. We can see what we can do differently as a result of Storm Arwen.”
While the UK as a whole imports 80% of its timber requirements and is the second biggest net importer of timber in the world next to China, Scotland is a net exporter of timber.
READ MORE: Clean-up of around eight million Scottish trees damaged by Storm Arwen gets going
“Scotland is well ahead of the rest of the UK in combatting that imported timber element because of the efforts we are putting in,” said Howieson. “The situation is much better here because of the investment the Scottish Government is making in woodland creation. We have a greater forest and woodland resource and are adding to that all the time.
“For all replanting now we would expect at least 25% to be made up of native broadleaf, open space and other conifers rather than the main one that was planted. The storm gives us the opportunity to drive forward resilience and species diversity.”
However, it will be almost a year before all public access to affected woodlands will be restored, according to Howieson.
“By this time next year everything will be cleared up and back to normal and all the paths will be open,” he predicted. “It takes a bit of work to mobilise people and machinery and do the planning. Some of the sites are protected habitats so we can’t just race into them and start felling trees. We need to make sure felling has no impact on badger setts or protected bird species, for example.”
Scottish Forestry is working with the timber industry and Forestry England to make sure the clean-up is undertaken collaboratively so that villages are not exposed to undue disruption from wagons and sawmills are not overwhelmed.
A meeting has already been held in the north east of Scotland and one will be held this week in the south of the country.
READ MORE: 'Superb' Scottish hawthorn wins UK Tree of the Year competition
“What we are trying to do is get everyone together to try and co-ordinate the response in a collaborative way so we can clear it up with the minimum amount of impact on forest users and the general public,” said Howieson.
“For example, we have put the forestry sector in touch with local authorities to ensure the movement of timber wagons is carefully managed and the timber growers are in touch with the sawmills to create a wider sector response in a structured non-panicked way.
“We want to make sure timber wagons are properly utilised and the carbon footprint of tidying this up is as low as possible. If we have all these timber wagons moving to an area where they don’t need to, that increases the carbon footprint and causes more disruption to villages in the way.”
As the storm blew over most of the trees, rather than snapping off branches, the timber is still viable and can go to market. In Scotland about five million cubic metres of timber are felled every year and this represents, at worst, a fifth of that.
Satellite data and imagery has been used for the first time to assess the scale of the damage and there is an interactive map which can be accessed on the Scottish Forestry website which shows the worst hit areas.
“To be able to turn this information around through satellite data very quickly is a new novel approach for us and so far has been very successful,” said Howieson.
READ MORE: Mark Ruskell: We can’t underestimate the consequences of Storm Arwen
Forestry and Land Scotland is in charge of many of the forests that are home to Scotland’s popular mountain bike trails.
A spokesperson said clearing them would be a “long job”.
“The damage caused by Storm Arwen has been extensive and clear-up work will continue to occupy us for the next few months,” he said.
“With the more easily achievable work having been done and the less affected trails re-opened before Christmas, we’re now getting in to the longer term, harder to clear areas.
“It’s a long job and – knowing how important the trails are for local tourism – we will do our utmost to deal with the remaining issues as quickly, and safely, as possible.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel