THE Tory government is using a loophole in parliamentary rules to avoid answering questions, a Labour MP has alleged.
Leader of the House of Commons Jacob Rees-Mogg was facing questions at Westminster’s procedure committee on Monday when the issue came up.
The committee was asking about the disproportionate cost threshold (DCT) and how it is calculated.
DCT refers to an advisory cost limit above which a government department can refuse to answer a Parliamentary Question. It currently stands at £850.
Rees-Mogg said this was a reasonable cost as it was a “good week’s work from a junior civil servant”.
READ MORE: 'Bring your own booze' to No 10 party mid-lockdown, leaked email tells staff
SNP MP Owen Thompson and Labour MP Kevan Jones quizzed the top Tory on the issue, with Jones saying he had asked questions of both the Treasury and the Ministry of Defence and been told answering them would be too expensive.
“I’ve asked the same questions a year ago and got an answer,” he said. “Lo and behold now, because there’s new ministers, this [DCT] is being used.”
Jones (below) suggested that there had been a clear “increase” in the practice and that some departments were using the rule to “avoid” scrutiny. Thompson could be seen to nod in agreement as he spoke.
Asked if the Treasury had shared with him the formula for calculating the cost of answering a parliamentary question, Rees-Mogg said he did not have the methodology but that he assumed it must exist as “you’ve got to have some means of working out what the cost is, you can’t just invent it”.
He said that the “key is are members questions by and large being answered or are lots of questions getting the disproportionate cost and therefore accountability is declining”.
“I think the result is more important than the process,” he said.
The committee hearing also looked at proxy voting and whether to extend the practice to allow more MPs to vote remotely.
Rees-Mogg expressed concerns about the idea, saying some members could use it for “trivial reasons”.
He also claimed that it would be too difficult to decide who had a genuine medical reason for using a proxy, and who had a slight injury.
READ MORE: Tory MP James Gray apologises for joke about sending 'bomb' to Labour MP
Tory MP James Gray said: “I've fallen off my horse hunting in Wiltshire and slightly sprained my ankle. I ring up and say I’m awfully sorry I’m not going to make it.”
Yes, this really happened: https://t.co/FDdCDem2yh pic.twitter.com/mfnVsSsD6S
— Alain Tolhurst (@Alain_Tolhurst) January 10, 2022
“This is where it gets so difficult,” Rees-Mogg responded. “The definitions become hard and the policing of definitions even harder.”
Last week, SNP MP Amy Callaghan wrote to the Tory MP urging him to bring back proxy voting and virtual participation for those with long-term health conditions.
“At an earlier stage in the pandemic, parliament proved that it was perfectly capable of operating with hybrid participation and proxy voting. The decision to revoke it represented a backward step for inclusivity and for the modernisation of this parliament,” Callaghan wrote.
“The weeks prior to the Christmas recess saw many Members and staff on the estate contracting Covid or being asked to isolate as contacts.
“For any member, but particularly so for those who are unwell, clinically vulnerable or carers, this is exclusionary and causing constituents across the UK to be disenfranchised.
“It is not the time for the Government to dig its heels in on this matter.”
The chair of the Procedure Committee, Tory MP Karen Bradley, could not attend Monday’s session as she was self-isolating.
Chris Elmore, the Labour MP for Ogmore, chaired the meeting in her place.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel