THE Commons Speaker said he was “not impressed” with a minister’s response to a question about Foreign Secretary Liz Truss allegedly overruling civil servants’ advice to host an expensive lunch at a Conservative donor’s private members’ club.
The Sunday Times reported that Truss, who was then international trade secretary, overruled officials to request to host a £3000 lunch for a US trade representative.
The location chosen was a Conservative donor’s private members’ club in Mayfair, the paper reported.
The Sunday Times added that the bill was negotiated down to £1400.
In the Commons on Thursday, during a sessions of questions to the Cabinet Office, Labour MP Catherine West asked the Government if the incident would be investigated.
READ MORE: Liz Truss spent £1400 on boozy lunch at Tory donor's restaurant
The Hornsey and Wood Green MP asked “why the Foreign Secretary overruled the civil servants’ advice and took out to a £3000 lunch in a private members club owned by a Tory donor, and he calls that abiding by the code”.
“Will he immediately include this in the investigation which is being undertaken into the other boozy parties in Number 10?”
Cabinet Office minister Michael Ellis responded: “It’s ridiculous to characterise the matter in the way that she does. The reality of the matter is the Labour Party engage in trade union entertainment on every possible occasion.
“There is no conflict of interest in the matter that she describes and indeed all of the matters that are brought to the attention of the relevant authorities are properly dealt with.”
Sir Lindsay Hoyle said it was “not a very good answer” and that he was “not impressed with that”.
The Sunday Times quoted a spokesperson for the Department for International Trade as saying: “This was a diplomatic working dinner attended by the previous international trade secretary, senior UK officials, and US counterparts from our largest single trading partner.”
The paper reported a source that said the venue was able to host attendees in a Covid-secure and private space.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel