BORIS Johnson went to stay in his second home in the country during a ban on non-essential travel, the UK Government has admitted.
Johnson and wife Carrie Johnson used their Chequers pad during March 2020.
That was before Scotland's then-chief medical officer Catherine Calderwood was caught out travelling to her second home, a move that cost her the high-profile job.
It's also before ex-Number 10 spin doctor Dominic Cummings went to Barnard Castle.
Johnson and Symonds travelled to the Buckinghamshire grace and favour home because she was pregnant and had been told to "minimise social contact", Downing Street has said.
The confirmation, made in a statement to the Tortoise news service, comes on top of a damaging string of revelations about parties held by government teams.
This includes late-night drinks and dancing on the eve of Prince Philip's funeral and the garden "work meeting" attended by Johnson and his wife with their child.
READ MORE: If Boris Johnson goes, what next for Scottish independence?
Tortoise reported that it has been asking questions about Chequers for more than a year and faced previous denials from officials.
Restrictions on non-essential travel came in on March 16 2020. The Prime Minister himself made a public statement on the matter.
It's understood that the Johnsons went to Chequers that day and stayed until March 27.
Downing Street said: "At that time [between 16 March and 27 March 2020], Mrs Johnson was heavily pregnant and had been placed in a vulnerable category and advised to minimise social contact.
"In line with clinical guidance and to minimise the risk to her they were based at Chequers during this period, with the Prime Minister commuting to Downing Street to work."
However, the news service says it has evidence that Johnson commuted to London during the period and that Chequers staff contracted Covid during the period.
At the time, guidance stated that essential travel "does not include visit to second homes… whether for isolation purposes or holidays".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel