A BREAKAWAY Tory party in Scotland is unlikely to solve Douglas Ross's immediate problems, according to polling guru Sir John Curtice.
He said that while there was no available data on the specific question, it was something that went back to the Scottish leadership battle in 2011 between Ruth Davidson and Murdo Fraser.
Speaking on The Sunday Show on BBC Scotland, he said: “That kind of project of persuading people you've created a new party with a different image that's more separate from Westminster is a long term project.
“It’s not something that's likely to solve the party's immediate problems, because you've really got to persuade voters you're something different and that doesn't happen in a matter of weeks, and certainly not between now and [council elections at] the beginning of May.”
READ MORE: Allegra Stratton’s resignation speech reminded us of Tory priorities
Curtice was responding to an Opinium poll for the Observer, which put Labour 10 points ahead of the Tories at 41% – double their lead the previous week – and Boris Johnson’s personal approval rating crashing to minus 42.
More than two thirds of the 2000 people polled thought the police should investigate Johnson and the goings-on in Downing Street, and almost half of Tory voters at the last election thought he should resign as party leader.
Curtice said: “The crucial thing to do in looking at these polls is to compare the position now without just before Christmas, because … the polls were registering the impact of the first round of ‘partygate’ that was instigated by that now infamous video that featured Allegra Stratton struggling to defend the party that was supposedly held in December 2020.
“The point is now that the polls show the Conservatives around two points weaker than they were just before Christmas, Labour about two points higher. In other words, they're in an even more difficult position now than they were in the wake of the first round of allegations … The Prime Minister's personal approval ratings have plummeted very dramatically indeed now.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak gives his reason for missing 'partygate' PMQs
“In other polls amongst those who voted Conservative in 2019, rather more of them now say they’re unhappy with Boris Johnson as Prime Minister then say they are happy. That’s a very marked position, a position that's emerged literally, over the course of the last week or so.”
Curtice said of all the Tory contenders for the party leadership, Rishi Sunak is best known to voters and has the most popular profile.
But any successor would have to keep together “that substantial body of leave voters, three-quarters of whom voted for the Conservatives in 2019”.
He thought the opposition parties would prefer Johnson to remain, although if he did go and the Tories moved more towards the centre right than under him, Labour might find that an easier target in the longer run.
The pollster then turned to Scotland and the local elections in May, which could prove difficult for the Tories were Johnson still charge.
“All I think we can say so far about the central question in Scotland, which is its constitutional status, is we've had one poll since the first round of ‘partygate’ that did not show any significant rise in support for independence,” he said.
“So I don't think we should necessarily assume that if Boris Johnson were to survive, unpopular as he is, that that's necessarily going to make life difficult so far as support for No [to independence] is concerned, though undoubtedly that poll did show it was doing damage to the Conservatives north of the Border … the prospects of fighting the local elections in May effectively where they are defending the good set of results in 2017, looks markedly more difficult if Boris Johnson were to still be Prime Minister at the beginning of May.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel