THE government has committed a “brazen attack on democracy” by mandating voter ID and exerting more power over the elections watchdog.
The Tories have been accused of trying to “silence the opposition” and of “disenfranchising” marginalised voters.
Naomi Smith, CEO of the democracy campaign group Best for Britain, said the bill would “stack the deck” for the government in future elections.
She said: “Not only will this Bill allow the government to disenfranchise vulnerable groups to tackle a problem that doesn’t exist, but it also allows them to ban their critics from campaigning and gives them an iron grip over the currently independent elections watchdog.
“Make no mistake, the true aim of this Bill is to silence opposition and stack the deck for future elections. It is a brazen attack on our democracy.”
Ministers were also accused of attempting to “dodge scrutiny” over controversial parts of the bill.
Dr Jess Garland, director of Policy and Research at the Electoral Reform Society, said: “The government's Elections Bill proposals are less about improving our democracy than they are an attack on voters’ ability to cast their ballot and have their voice count.
“Ministers have attempted to dodge scrutiny over key parts of this bill and the result is a dangerous mix of proposals that risk shutting voters out of our democracy and weakening the integrity of our elections.
“From plans to shut voters out from the ballot box for lacking the right ID, to minsters’ power grab over our independent elections watchdog, this bill stands to damage democracy."
Brendan O'Hara, the SNP's deputy spokesperson for the Cabinet Office, called the bill a "fundamental assault on democracy".
The MP for Argyll and Bute said: "These are incredibly dangerous days for our democracy."
Last-ditch attempts by the Westminster opposition to block the voter ID mandate and a bid to bring England into line with Scotland by lowering the voting age to 16 were defeated in the Commons tonight.
The bill will enforce voter ID checks at polling stations - something opponents say will discourage people from marginalised groups, many of whom do not own photographic identification, from voting.
Voters without ID will be provided with one free of charge but opponents say this will still deter significant numbers from voting.
The government maintains tackling voter fraud is a national priority despite there being little evidence to suggest the practice is widespread.
There were 595 cases of alleged voter fraud recorded across the UK in 2019, according to the Electoral Commission.
The independent body set up to monitor UK elections said only four of these led to a conviction and two people were given a police caution.
Voters in Holyrood elections and Scottish local government elections will not need to show photographic ID before voting - but will at UK general election ballots.
The bill will also allow ministers to set the priorities of the Speaker’s Committee on the Electoral Commission - a body that is supposed to be independent of the government.
The commission previously said an increase in oversight by the government would “place a fetter on the commission which would limit its activity”.
Some proposals in the bill will not affect Holyrood elections and Scottish local government elections, including increasing how frequently postal or proxy voters must apply from five to three years.
The bill will now be scrutinised by the House of Lords before becoming law.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel