A LETTER complaining about Boris Johnson's "effortless superiority" from one of his teachers has re-emerged as pressure continues to mount over Downing Street parties.
The report, from classics master Martin Hammond to Stanley Johnson in 1982, criticised the 17-year-old for thinking he should be free of the "network of obligation that binds everyone".
The teacher also said Johnson "believes it is churlish of us not to regard him as an exception".
READ MORE: Boris Johnson facing Tory rebellion amid claim he ignored self-isolation rules
He wrote: "Boris really has adopted a disgracefully cavalier attitude to his classical studies. [He] sometimes seems affronted when criticised for what amounts to a gross failure of responsibility (and surprised at the same time that he was not appointed Captain of the school for the next half).
"I think he honestly believes that it is churlish of us not to regard him as an exception, one who should be free of the network of obligation that binds everyone else."
It comes as Tory MPs from several ranks of the party said they think there would be enough letters to trigger a leadership contest after the publication of Sue Gray's inquiry into the lockdown breaches.
It's also emerged a group of a dozen or so of the 2019 intake had met in the office of Alicia Kearns, Rutland and Melton Tory MP, to discuss his future as prime minister.
Johnson had the prestigious education at Eton after winning a scholarship.
READ MORE: Line of Duty team interrogates Boris Johnson in fantastic Led By Donkeys clip
It was also reported in The Times that the Conservative leader ignored his own isolation rules after contracting Covid-19 in March 2020.
Despite warnings from No 10 staff after developing a bad cough, Johnson reportedly continued to hold in-person briefings and had staff in to help with IT problems – even after being confined to the Chancellor’s office. He is said to have dismissed concerns by beating his chest and claiming he was “strong like bull”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel