MSPs at Holyrood have voted down a "highly irresponsible" Scottish Tory motion on education.
MSP Meghan Gallacher tabled the motion in the Scottish Parliament which claimed “that education has never been the First Minister Nicola Sturgeon’s number one priority”.
It went on to “express frustration at the widening attainment gap and the failure to guarantee that the 2022 school examination diet will go ahead in full”.
An SNP amendment to the motion passed by 67 votes to 54.
The amended motion was then passed by 67 votes to 53 with one abstention.
Speaking in favour of the motion, Gallacher said young people were being left “in limbo” over their exams after it was announced a final decision on whether they will go forward could come as late as March.
READ MORE: Decision on exams going ahead to be made by the end of March 'at the latest'
“If teachers were given a clear steer by this government, they would be able to plan and make sure their students were ready to sit their exams,” she said.
She added: “Any responsible government would have started preparing for this year’s exams last year and would made sure that alternative arrangements had been secured to ensure minimal disruption to school exams.”
In fact, two contingency plans were announced in August by the Scottish Qualifications Authority in case Covid-19 continues to create issues in education.
The first allows the Scottish Government to make amendments to assessments if the pandemic causes interruptions to learning, but public health officials say exams can go ahead.
The second means exams can be cancelled if advisers believe it would not be safe – with the diet replaced by a teacher judgment model.
Responding to the Scots Tory, Education Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said “caution” was still needed when approaching the exam diet due to the nature of the pandemic.
She added: “I strongly disagree with this highly irresponsible motion.”
Somerville continued: “As I’ve repeatedly set out since the beginning of this term, it is our firm intention for exams to take place.
“But it would be highly irresponsible to ignore the possibility, however exceptionally remote that we hope it will be, of the pandemic worsening therefore we have a robust contingency should the public health conditions make exams impossible.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel