BUILDING tunnels or bridges to replace key ferry routes around Scotland is just one of the sweeping recommendations put forward by the Government’s newly published transport review.
The 20-year investment strategy also includes a metro system that could “transform” the Glasgow area, increased mass transit links for Edinburgh and Aberdeen, and “active freeways” forming a part of a much larger “long-distance active travel network”.
Other potential investments include a smart, integrated public transport ticketing system, an expansion of 20mph zones, decarbonisation of ferries and trains, and developing a net zero freight and logistics network for Scotland.
It also mentions work to improve the “vital artery” on the A83 at Rest and Be Thankful - a key road that faces frequent blockages due to landslips.
READ MORE: 'No Rest and Be Thankful solution until 2030': Road issues enrage locals
In all, the second Strategic Transport Projects Review (STPR2) makes 45 recommendations under six key themes to make transport in Scotland more sustainable.
These include:
The Clyde Metro
The review outlines plans for a metro system encompassing an area of around 15km in all directions from Glasgow’s city centre. Such a system could include a combination of bus rapid transit, light rail, and metro rail and would be targeted at areas where connections are currently poor, including places where there is deprivation.
A map of the potential system (below) is provided as part of a draft technical report.
Fixed links to replace ferries
STPR2 recommends replacing current ferry routes at the Sound of Harris, the Sound of Barra and between Craignure on Mull and Oban on the Scottish mainland. It says that putting bridges or tunnels in place could “improve reliability, connectivity, capacity and crossing times”. It also says that adding further fixed links between islands in the Outer Hebrides “would allow for the reconfiguration of transport provision” between there and the mainland.
Long-distance active travel network
One goal outlined in the review is to “provide a nationwide network connecting Scotland’s communities for people walking, wheeling and cycling”. The report says that towns and villages would be connected to cities to encourage people to switch from driving cars. It says a key factor in doing this would be “addressing safety fears through effective segregation from traffic”.
The Government said that such investments would help to reduce overall demand for private vehicles, improve accessibility to employment, education, healthcare and leisure amenities, and strengthen strategic transport connections to, from and within rural areas.
Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero, Energy and Transport, Michael Matheson said the review showed a “repositioning of our transport investment priorities”.
He went on: “The investment decisions we make now have never been more important. A green recovery from Covid-19 will set us on a path to delivering a fair and just transition to Net Zero.
“The pandemic has led to fundamental shifts in travel behaviours and we want to ensure that people continue to make sustainable travel choices, that they return to public transport and our economic recovery does not overly rely on road-based travel.”
READ MORE: Free public transport in Glasgow should be COP26 legacy, campaigners say
Glasgow council leader Susain Aitken said the Clyde Metro could be “transformational”. She went on: “Over the past several decades, modern rapid transit systems like Metro are what Glasgow’s comparator cities across the globe have been busy constructing. We cannot continue to be left behind.
“More than arguably any other single intervention, Clyde Metro can help deliver a vibrant, prosperous, inclusive and sustainable city region, a transport system fit for our international standing and ambitions.”
Alex Hynes, the managing director of Scotland’s Railway, and Karen McGregor, the director of capital programmes for cycling and walking charity Sustrans Scotland, both welcomed the role public and active transport is to be given.
You can find the full STPR2 report here, and the draft technical report here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel