DOWNING Street is resisting opening an investigation into claims Tory MPs were being “blackmailed” into supporting Boris Johnson to keep his job as PM.
We previously told how senior Tory William Wragg said rebels who had considered sending letters to 1922 committee chairman Sir Graham Brady which would trigger a no confidence vote were being threatened that investments in constituencies would be “withdrawn” if they went ahead.
There were also claims of intimidation and pressure from Number 10 staff in a bid to keep Johnson in post.
READ MORE: Scottish independence support on the rise amid Boris Johnson's chaos, pollster finds
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has said she was "shocked" by the claims and called for an independent probe on Thursday, and the SNP has said the PM can't "sweep the claims under the carpet".
Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng disputed the allegation first made by Wragg but said if true it would be “completely unacceptable” and ministers “need to get to the bottom of the matter”.
But No 10 suggested on Friday that an investigation will only be launched “if there was any evidence” to support the claims, despite calls from Labour and Tory MPs.
Wragg, chairman of the Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, said the threats could amount to “blackmail” and urged colleagues to report them to the police.
Christian Wakeford, the Bury South MP who defected from the Tories to Labour, then said he was threatened that funding for a new school in his constituency would be withheld if he did not vote with the Government over free school meals.
Kwarteng told Sky News: “As far as the specific allegation about whips withholding funds, I think that’s completely unacceptable.
“Any form of blackmail and intimidation of that kind simply has no place in British politics.
“We need to get to the bottom of the matter. But I find it very unlikely that these allegations are true.”
READ MORE: Tories branded 'out of touch' as vast majority of Scots backed Covid rules
The Business Secretary said Wakeford’s “very serious” allegation has so far been “unsubstantiated”.
Kwarteng told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme:“I’m sure it will be investigated if it’s not being so already – after 12 years as an MP I’ve never heard anything like this.
“Having been an MP for 12 years I’ve never heard of anyone making a threat, certainly not to me or to anybody else of that kind, doesn’t mean it’s not true.”
But a spokesman for the Prime Minister said: “We’re not aware of any evidence to support what are clearly serious allegations.
“If there was any evidence to support it, it would of course be looked at.”
Johnson has faced multiple calls for him to resign amid the partygate scandals
The claims of intimidation come as Johnson battles to remain in power ahead of the result of senior civil servant Sue Gray’s inquiry into allegations of rule-breaking partying during coronavirus restrictions.The result of her investigation is not expected until next week.
SNP MP Pete Wishart said: "Mounting reports of threats, intimidation and blackmail is not something that Downing Street can attempt to brush under its already scandal-stuffed carpet.
"They need to be investigated properly, and most importantly, independently.
"Boris Johnson has lost all moral authority to lead and his government is the most corrupt in decades. If he continues to refuse to go, then it is on Tory MPs to act to remove him from office."
On Thursday, the Prime Minister said Wragg’s allegation will “of course” be looked into, but he added he has “seen no evidence” to support it.
The Times reported Tory MPs wanting to oust the Prime Minister are considering publishing a secretly recorded conversation with the chief whip, and messages, to help support the claims.
READ MORE: Tory MSP 'lies twice in 10 seconds' about Scottish Government's record
Douglas Ross, the Scottish Tory leader who is among those demanding Johnson’s resignation, said the allegations should be “properly investigated”.
Wragg is one of a handful of Tory backbenchers to have said publicly they have submitted a letter to the chairman of the backbench 1922 Committee calling for a no-confidence vote in Johnson’s leadership.
Wakeford said he had done the same before he defected to Labour shortly before Prime Minister’s Questions this week.
On Thursday he told BBC North West: “I was threatened that I would not get the school for Radcliffe if I did not vote in one particular way. This is a town that’s not had a high school for the best part of 10 years.”
Wakeford defected to Labour on Wednesday just 15 minutes before PMQs
New claims of threats under a previous administration also emerged on Friday when former Tory MP Ben Howlett said an ex-whip warned him funds would be withheld from his constituency over a link road project if he did not support the Government during Brexit votes.
Howlett, the MP for Bath between 2015 and 2017, told the PA news agency: “If I was a less resilient MP, in those days I would’ve ended up thinking, ‘Oh god am I going to carry on rebelling against the Government on Brexit if my major campaign message was going to be undermined as a result’, there was some pretty devious tactics.”
On the current allegations in Westminster, he said: “As a Prime Minister who’s trying to build bridges with his backbenchers it doesn’t look very good at all, in fact it’s completely counterproductive at this moment in time to end up sending his flunkies to persuade a load of backbench MPs to go and support him by using tactics like that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel