ON Tuesday, Scots at home and abroad celebrate the legacy of arguably our greatest son. There is no denying the global reach of Robert Burns. The Centre for Robert Burns Studies at Glasgow University, established in 2007, undertakes various projects relating to Burns’s legacy, his life and work. My own research, undertaken in conjunction with the centre, concentrated largely on one aspect of his legacy in the United States.
To provide some background to Burns’s popularity in America, it is important to understand how the poet was viewed in that emerging nation. An edition of his poems was published in a Philadelphia newspaper shortly after the publication in Scotland of his Poems, Chiefly In The Scottish Dialect (popularly known as the Kilmarnock Edition) in 1786. A New York edition of his work followed soon after and his fame spread across America. It is clear that many prominent figures in America’s history were inspired by the poet’s work, in particular his themes of liberty and democracy. Many 19th-century politicians, writers and abolitionists, for example, were admirers.
Abraham Lincoln regularly quoted the poet and was known to give toasts at Burns Night celebrations. On the opposite side of the Civil War divide, the president of the Confederacy, Jefferson Davis, even visited the cottage in Alloway in which Burns was born. American writers including Mark Twain, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Walt Whitman greatly admired Burns. John Greenleaf Whittier, the “Quaker Poet” of Massachusetts, went so far as to adopt Scots as a poetic language. The depiction of Burns as a “democratic poet” was attractive to those in the fledgling United States. Thus, Burns was popular among well-known abolitionists such as Gerrit Smith, Henry Ward Beecher and William Lloyd Garrison. The most prominent abolitionist of the period, Frederick Douglass (below), visited Alloway and met the poet’s sister, Isabella Burns Begg.
The popularity of Burns in America continued into the 20th century. On a scholarly level, a man who, in his obituary, was referred to as “the foremost 20th-century authority on Robert Burns” was the American John DeLancey Ferguson. In popular culture, too, the popularity of Burns in American life was evident. By 1933, there were 19 Burns clubs across the US and numerous statues coast to coast. Prominent 20th-century writers such as William Faulkner, Willa Cather and Arthur Miller were deeply influenced by Burns. The poet Robert Frost, whose mother was Scottish, was introduced to Burns’s works as a child and became fascinated with the Scots poet. Frost spent a long career as a teacher and reportedly had his students memorise and recite Burns’s poems. Burns’s image was also regularly seen in newspapers nationwide, advertising “Robert Burns cigars” or Harris tweed. His words are quoted proverbially, suggesting widespread knowledge and awareness of his poetry. Newspapers, for instance, make regular reference to “the best laid schemes o’ mice an’ men”.
Therefore, the Scots poet was an influence on a great many important figures, undoubtedly more than was previously thought. The transatlantic importance of Burns is an area of research that has become more prominent in the past 10 years or so. The “best laid schemes o’ mice an’ men” leads me to the influence of Burns on the American writer John Steinbeck (below).
There has been a tendency, both culturally and academically, to presume an influence of Burns on Steinbeck given the latter’s use of Burns’s phrase from To A Mouse for the title of his 1937 novella, Of Mice And Men. But more often than not, those who refer to this link do not delve deeper into Steinbeck’s reasons for his use of Burns’s words. With Burns’s work being ubiquitous in the America in which Steinbeck grew up, he was certainly exposed to the Scots poet. Growing up and developing his writing career in the early 20th century, Steinbeck was part of a wider culture which had an abiding interest in Burns, and a particular view of him as a man and a poet. Burns’s appeal due to his support for American democracy is very much evident in popular magazines of the day, magazines to which Steinbeck’s family subscribed and which the young John read enthusiastically. Steinbeck had been exposed to the work of Burns as a youngster. Although there is no direct influence of Steinbeck mentioning the influence of Burns, he was undoubtedly aware of his works and had a good knowledge of the themes about which Burns wrote. For instance, he was, in the case of To A Mouse, acquainted enough to understand the novella he would call Of Mice And Men was concerned with similar themes, including the ultimate futility of preparing for a future over which you have no control, whether mouse or itinerant worker.
There were similarities in political ideology between Burns and Steinbeck even though the worlds in which they lived were very different. The two writers shared “fundamental human values”. Both wrote compassionately about common people and were concerned with accurately portraying the speech of ordinary folk. The politics of both were tied to the landscape – they shared a passion for the land and of small farming communities. It could be argued that the pastoral element to Steinbeck’s work was influenced by his knowledge of Burns, and of poems such as The Cotter’s Saturday Night.
Both Steinbeck and Burns were sentimental, and sometimes their sentimentality has been portrayed negatively by critics. However, this aspect of their respective outputs was genuine, honest and very much representative of the ideology of both. The humble and rustic folk about which Steinbeck affectionately wrote, for example, can be seen in the paisanos of Tortilla Flat or the characters in his Dustbowl Trilogy of In Dubious Battle, Of Mice And Men and The Grapes Of Wrath. Burns, as recognised and admired by William Wordsworth, wrote with affection for ordinary folk, from specific characters such as Souter Johnnie and Tam o’ Shanter to his more general call for universal brotherhood in A Man’s A Man For A’ That. Both Steinbeck and Burns also wrote of the relationship between all living things, represented by the breaking of “Nature’s social union” for Burns.
The lives of both are linked further by their more radical politics. Inspired by revolution in America and France, and by figures such as Thomas Muir in Scotland, Burns faced significant risk to his position and livelihood by supporting the cause of liberty, a seditious act at the time. Was Steinbeck influenced by Burns’s radical views? Probably not, but it is an interesting exercise to compare the similar reactions the authorities had in response to their respective radical viewpoints and to contrast the responses of Burns and Steinbeck to the censorship they faced. Throughout much of his career, Steinbeck was in conflict with authority and suspected of being a Communist by the FBI. Steinbeck’s radicalism cooled somewhat after his great novels of social conscience of the 1930s and, it could be argued, his commitment to the cause of radicalism was not as deep-seated as that of Burns. However, Steinbeck retained a democratic ideology all his life and, like Burns, believed in equality and opposed prejudice.
Many of Steinbeck’s contemporaries were familiar with the work of Burns. In addition, artists within his own circle of friends, such as Woody Guthrie, were influenced by the Scots poet and were undoubtedly at least an indirect influence on Steinbeck. Guthrie openly admired Burns. His songs about Dustbowl America and the struggles of ordinary folk inspired others including Bob Dylan. In the 1930s, Steinbeck and Guthrie had the same friends and attended the same parties during this period of Steinbeck’s flirtation with Communism. It is likely that Guthrie’s enthusiasm for Burns had an effect on the novelist at a time when Steinbeck was writing about democratic ideals and the trials of the common man.
It should also be noted that Steinbeck had a more general awareness of Scotland and its politics. In response to a letter he had received from Jacqueline Kennedy, in which she spoke about her late husband, John F Kennedy, and the subject of lost causes, Steinbeck responded to a particular point she had proposed: “I have been thinking about what you said regarding lost causes. And it is such a strange subject. It seems to me that the only truly lost causes are those which win. Only then do they break up into mean little fragments. You talked of Scotland as a lost cause and that is not true. Scotland is an unwon cause.”
Whether Steinbeck’s interest in Scotland and the cause of national self-determination came from a knowledge of Burns, or via another source, he was certainly of the opinion that Scotland’s independence was there to be taken.
John MacKenzie is a researcher at Glasgow University who is studying the links between Burns and Steinbeck. His full thesis can be found at: theses.gla.ac.uk/82549
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel