THE majority of Scots want a straight choice between independence and the Union in a future referendum, a new poll suggests.
More than half of respondents said they do not want a three-option referendum on the constitution, but 26% were in favour of the most likely additional choice.
The study by Savanta ComRes for Scotland on Sunday found that 55% of the 1004 people who responded wanted to limit the scope of another referendum to staying in or leaving the UK.
A potential third option – devo-max, which was proposed numerous times in the independence debate – would see Scotland take control of every area of governance, including full taxation powers, but not defence and foreign policy.
Of the 26% of people in the poll who backed the devo-max option, just 4% said they strongly support it.
READ MORE: GERS figures 'are widely misinterpreted and should be scrapped', top economist says
Labour supporters were most likely to back the idea, with 37%, while 48% said they were opposed.
Some 32% of SNP voters also supported the idea.
When asked if they believed devo-max was a good or bad compromise, 39% of all people polled believed it was negative, while 32% believed the option to be positive.
However, high ranking SNP figures described the idea as “idiotic” when it was raised by former policy chief Chris Hanlon.
In a piece in the National earlier this month, Hanlon said: “Devo-max isn’t my preference and maybe, given the changed circumstances, it might not be the choice of the majority of the people of Scotland.
“But part of me remains of the opinion that excluding it from the ballot paper is just plain wrong. The people must have the option of choosing the path the largest percentage of them favour.”
The idea was quickly rebuked by MSPs, with mental health minister Kevin Stewart describing it as “idiotic, foolish, nonsensical”, while Aberdeenshire East MSP Gillian Martin branded the third option “a con”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel