SCOTLAND’S most prominent historian Professor Tom Devine has accused two of the country’s leading universities of a “conspiracy of silence” amid a fellow senior academic’s attack on him and a colleague.
The scholar has called for a public apology and is considering legal action against Sir Geoff Palmer who is conducting an inquiry into the University of Edinburgh’s links to slavery.
Palmer described Professor Jonathan Hearn of the University of Edinburgh as a member of “an academic racist gang” on Twitter over differing views on the legacy of 18th-century lawyer and politician Henry Dundas. When Devine, an emeritus professor of history at the same university, said Palmer’s “appalling slurs” should result in his dismissal as chairman of a group assessing the university’s historical links with slavery, he too was branded a racist.
The principal of the University of Edinburgh Peter Mathieson reprimanded Palmer, who is Chancellor and emeritus professor at Heriot-Watt University. Mathieson said in an email to staff on Friday that the review was “critically important work which has our full backing”, adding that it was crucial to ensure “no-one is deterred from participating by any sense that their contributions might be different or contradictory to others”.
READ MORE: Tom Devine demands 'public apology' from Geoff Palmer over 'racism' attack
He said: “All debate, discussion and disagreement must be conducted in a respectful manner at all times, abiding by the law and under the auspices of the university’s dignity and respect policy. I do not feel that has been the case with recent events and I have therefore spoken to the chair of the steering group of the university’s review, Sir Geoff Palmer, to clarify expectations under the university’s dignity and respect policy.”
Devine told the Sunday National he was speaking to lawyers and said a scholar’s reputation could be “shredded” by such a slur. He said the attack was ironic as he had been responsible for pioneering work examining Scotland’s historic links with slavery when the country was possibly “in denial” about the connections. Speaking to the National last night – as the row showed no sign of calming – Devine hit out at Edinburgh and Heriot-Watt universities and called for a debate in Holyrood on academic freedom.
“Shamefully, the author of the revolting slurs against Professor Jonathan Hearn and myself still retains the chairs of two important committees at the University of Edinburgh and Edinburgh City Council respectively,” he said. “The university has merely released vapid and platitudinous responses to questions from the press about this affair with no specific mention of the individual concerned.”
He added: “There has not been a cheap from Heriot-Watt University where he also occupies high office. Amid this conspiracy of silence, it is important that the crucial issues of academic freedom and the responsibilities of public institutions arising from this disgraceful episode should now be publicly debated. The best forum for that is the Parliament of Scotland.”
READ MORE: There is more than the slave trade to confront in Scotland’s colonial past
In order for a subject to be debated an MSP would need to lodge a motion in Parliament.
A spokesperson for Heriot-Watt University said: “Professor Sir Geoff Palmer shared his personal views in an independent capacity and it would be inappropriate for us to comment further at this time. We have no plans to review his position.”
A University of Edinburgh statement said: “Our commitment to reviewing the university’s past and present links on race remains steadfast. We want this process to be conducted in a culture of mutual respect with all views considered throughout.
“It is a difficult and emotive topic, and we understand that our discussions and conclusions will be scrutinised, but we will remain focused on taking this important work forward.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel