INDYREF planning is firmly back on the agenda as the threat from Covid recedes, it has been announced.
Both Nicola Sturgeon and John Swinney have said in recent days that the Scottish Government is back to drawing up plans for a second referendum.
Planning was suspended from March 2020 because of the pandemic but it is now understood work is back on track - with Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson confirming to Parliament last week a team was working on referendum planning.
Unionist parties have reacted with fury to the news and accused the Scottish Government of having the wrong priorities - despite there being a pro-independence majority in Holyrood.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson will decide how much of Sue Gray inquiry is published
Sturgeon said in an interview on Sunday she will decide the date for introducing a bill on a second referendum “in the coming weeks”.
Conservatives
Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross said: “Nicola Sturgeon likes to talk up her ‘cautious’ approach - except when it comes to another divisive referendum. It’s reckless to charge ahead with her plan to split up Scotland when there’s an economic crisis to tackle.”
Tory MSP Megan Gallagher responded to a video of the First Minister confirming independence planning was underway, saying: “Our young people still face uncertainty over exams and still need to wear face masks in classrooms. Priorities eh?”
Murdo Fraser, MSP for Mid-Scotland and Fife, questioned how the Scottish Government could hope to legislate for another bill following a Supreme Court defeat on competence last year.
He said: “What will be fascinating to see here is if/how the Lord Advocate certifies the Bill as within devolved competence.
READ MORE: Stephen Kerr furious as SNP dare to bring up shocking UK cost of living crisis
“Impossible to see how any credible Scots lawyer could justify doing so given ruling of @UKSupremeCourt in the ECRC case.
Sharon Dowey, MSP for South Scotland, simply responded to the news with a gif of a woman responding with despair to the news the then-prime minister Theresa May had called a snap General Election in 2017.
Labour
Labour’s Michael Marra accused the Government of having “no plan” to deal with the fallout of the pandemic.
He added: “The impact on education of the pandemic is only beginning to be understood and the government have no plan to deal with any of the fallout.
“There is no sign of the infrastructure to cope with new waves or variants. The pandemic crisis has not ended. Far from it.”
READ MORE: John Curtice offers his predictions ahead of indyref2
Glasgow MSP Pam Duncan-Glancy added: “If a downward slope of the virus clears the way for anything, it should 100% be action to end child poverty, get the NHS back on track, fix education, create good and well paid jobs and pick up the pace on using our social security powers. Not another Indy ref.”
LibDem
LibDem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton, in a statement to the press on Sunday, accused the First Minister of “preparing the case for independence” instead of focusing on the country’s recovery from Covid.
He said: “The First Minister promised to put the recovery first.
“Last week Nicola Sturgeon ordered her MSPs to vote down my plans for a new Burnout Prevention Plan for NHS staff in desperate need of extra protection.
“The news that her government is busy preparing the case for independence instead says everything about this SNP/Green Government’s priorities during this hardest of winters.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel