CREATING a separate offence for spiking “should be examined further”, MSPs have heard.
The Education, Young People and Children Committee at Holyrood held a one-off evidence session to discuss a recent spate in reported spiking, both of drinks and by injection, in Scotland.
A number of social media reports circulated in October of incidents in major cities with high student populations, but police say the number of reports has since decreased.
There is currently no standalone offence for spiking, and such reports are dealt with using the drugging offence or under the Sexual Offences Act (Scotland) 2009.
Kate Wallace, the chief executive officer of Victim Support Scotland, was among those who supported the move.
“I think the conversation that we’ve been having around people feeling confident to report, feeling confident that they will be believed, and there will be an appropriate response both within a support system, and within the criminal justice system, I do think that looking at (creating a separate offence) would be helpful,” she said.
Wallace pointed to the creation of a separate offence of stalking which is now in place in Scotland, saying: “That makes a massive difference for victims and how they perceive how they’re going to be believed, how they’re going to be taken seriously.”
She added: “I think it should be examined further.”
READ MORE: 'No forensic evidence' of spiking by injection in Scotland despite surge in claims
Mike Grieve, the chairman of the Night Time Industries Association, also voiced his support for a legislative change, saying it could help to “build up an accurate picture” of spiking in Scotland, adding it could “shed light” on spiking by injection specifically.
Ellen MacRae, the President of the Edinburgh University Students Association, added that the creation of a new offence would “legitimise people’s experiences and their fears around spiking”.
But SNP MSP James Dornan raised concerns about the complexity of the legislation, questioning “where do you draw a line” on any offence.
Spiking by adding extra alcohol to a drink is the most common form, and Dornan questioned whether an offence could criminalise someone buying a friend a bigger drink than requested at a bar.
“What happens if you buy your mate a double without his permission? Where is the line drawn and how do you target those that need to be targeted?
“I think that’s one of the difficulties – although I definitely have supported legislation before which is about sending out that strong message and I can see where a strong message could be sent out here – I just worry about the practical difficulties.”
In response, Grieve said: “I think it’s really important to acknowledge that getting your mate a double if he’s not asked for it actually does cross a line.
“That’s why, in my opinion, there should be legislation around this because otherwise people will always say, ‘I was just having a laugh’.”
Wallace agreed with Grieve’s point, while Dornan added: “It does highlight the difficulty in what we’re talking about because you’re talking about changing a culture for people of a certain generation – but I agree, actually, with everything that’s just been said in relation to it, that they’re doing the wrong thing.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here