FINANCE Secretary Kate Forbes is urging MSPs to back her “bold and ambitious” spending plans for next year in a key vote at Holyrood today.
Forbes made the appeal amid concern from opposition parties about the amount of cash the Scottish Government has allocated to local government in its 2022-23 Budget.
MSPs are to discuss the general principles of tax and spending plans in the Scottish Parliament today.
Local government body Cosla have said the Budget allocation for councils, more than £11 billion, is a real-terms cut of £371 million.
Under the draft budget, local authorities will be able to raise council tax from April. The move was revealed in the budget document published last month and ends the SNP’s flagship policy to freeze or curb rises which had been in place since 2007.
Local councils have welcomed the move, complaining that they are struggling to fund vital services, but opposition parties have attacked it warning councils will inevitably raise the tax, putting pressure on householders.
Speaking ahead of the debate, Forbes said: “Our bold and ambitious spending plans are focused on supporting our key priorities, ensuring no one and no region is left behind.”
She said her draft budget “targets resources towards low-income households, invests in initiatives to end Scotland’s contribution to climate change and fundamentally, provides much-needed investment to bolster our economic recovery”.
She continued: “Recognising the severe impacts of the pandemic, £18 billion will support health boards and accelerate the recovery of vital health and social care services.
“Significant funding is also being provided to support the next steps in the single greatest public health reform since the establishment of the NHS – the creation of a new National Care Service.”
Tackling child poverty is another “key priority”, she added with the Scottish Government having pledged £197 million of cash to double the Scottish Child Payment – which is paid weekly to low-income families – from £10 to £20.
The Budget also allocates “at least £2 billion” in investments to support green jobs and work towards achieving net-zero emissions, Forbes said.
She also insisted: “Despite increased financial pressures, we are also continuing to treat councils fairly and we are providing a real-terms increase of over 5% to local authority budgets for the coming year – despite cuts to Scotland’s overall budget by the UK Government.”
Ahead of that debate, Scottish Conservatives pushed the Greens – who signed a powersharing agreement to enter Government last August – to “show some backbone” and stand up to SNP ministers over what they said to be a cut to councils.
However, Scottish Tory finance spokeswoman Liz Smith claimed that today’s vote was “the Greens’ big chance to show some backbone and stand up to the SNP”.
The Conservative said: “Unless they speak up and challenge the SNP over the devastating local council funding cut they have planned, the Greens will have abandoned their principles.
“It will be clearer than ever that they sold out simply for the good of the nationalist movement, and not for the good of the country.”
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton announced his party will vote against the Budget due to a lack of funding for social care and treatments for long Covid.
“Faced with a budget that delivers £371 million in cuts to local government and an unwillingness on the part of the SNP-Green Government to deliver key Scottish Liberal Democrat demands on long Covid and social care, we have no choice but to vote against the Budget at stage one,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel