A SECOND independence referendum must be a de facto vote on rejoining the European Union if Yes has any hope of winning, according to campaigners.
It follows the revelations in The National that key figures in the SNP are considering holding a second referendum after an independence referendum to confirm the terms of re-entering the EU.
Believe in Scotland (BIS), the pro-independence group headed up by Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp, said that indyref2 would be lost if “there is any ambiguity about our intention to rejoin the EU as an independent nation”.
BIS pointed to a poll, published on January 28, which showed that 97% of people who have moved from No to Yes have done so with the hope of seeing an independent Scotland rejoin the EU.
READ MORE: Why Yes may not win the economics debate but still win indyref2, according to John Curtice
They added: “When you look at the overall attitudes towards joining the EU from the whole Yes movement there is still a supermajority of 88% support for rejoining.”
The group said it had polled 5943 independence supporters “to seek their opinions on a range of issues impacting the movement”.
It went on: “[These results are] backed up from our general population research which identified majority Yes support amongst non-Scots-born voters (with specific policy offers) and rejoining the EU is fundamental to that as EU-born citizens will vote Yes in big numbers to rejoin the EU, whereas last time they feared a Yes vote meant leaving the EU.”
Writing earlier this week, Professor Sir John Curtice said we “can anticipate that any second referendum would be framed as a choice between an independent Scotland that would seek to rejoin the EU and a Scotland that was part of the UK but still outside the EU”.
He went on to say that such a framing would help to dispel concerns in voters’ minds that leaving the UK could have severe economic consequences without respite.
Curtice pointed to one poll which found that 45% of Scots thought the country would be better off economically independent within the EU, while just 35% thought it would be better off as part of the UK outside the EU.
READ MORE: Tim Rideout: Claim banks would flee independent Scotland is a Project Fear lie
Tim Rideout, the convener of the Scottish Currency Group, said the plan to hold two separate votes seemed “eminently sensible and democratic”.
“Bear in mind that would be 4 years or more AFTER Indy, so 2030?” he added.
Toni Giugliano, the SNP’s policy convener, said: “As democrats we would want to take the people of Scotland with us. I have no doubt that with Scotland having voted 62% to remain in the EU they would want to rejoin the European Union and escape the disaster of Brexit.
“But we should as democrats set out an approach where we want to take Scotland with us and do that through a referendum.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel