LABOUR really must be on the ropes.
Saying that Keir Starmer’s visit to Scotland would only be attended by one press agency, and then slying inviting one friendly newspaper on the side, isn’t the behaviour you might expect from a party in a strong position.
Neither, for that matter, is clutching at fragments of polls and claiming they show Anas Sarwar and Keir Starmer could be on to complete the hat-trick and get Labour into all three of Great Britain’s governments.
But then, would anybody be surprised if they did?
Prepare not to be surprised, as serial tweeter George Foulkes has opened his phone again.
The “Baron of Cumnock” wrote: “A small straw in the wind? Latest Ipsos MORI Scottish poll subset shows @ScottishLabour on 37% & @theSNP on 31%.
“The start of Starmer/Sarwar overtaking Sturgeon/Johnson?”
— Auchterturra 🇪🇺💙 (@Auchterturra) January 28, 2022
Social media users poked fun at the Labour lord. "A small straw in the wind, more like clutching at straw," one quipped.
"Is this a parody account?" a second asked.
Foulkes was referring to minutiae in the Ipsos MORI poll released on January 27 for which fieldwork was conducted between 19-25 of the same month.
It does state in that data that 27 people in Scotland said they’d vote Labour in a General Election, while only 23 said they’d vote SNP. It also said that just 10 would vote Tory, and only three LibDem.
However, the total sample was only 72 people, a data set so small it is “best ignored”, according to polling expert Mark McGeoghegan.
He told The Jouker: “The sub-sample of Scottish voters in Ipsos MORI's latest poll is just 72 people, and was not recruited to be representative of the population.
“Sub-samples are never reliable guides to a party's support among voters overall, and given that we have Scotland-specific polling that shows practically no change in support for Labour or the SNP, such sub-samples are best ignored.”
We’ll take that advice on a slightly wider basis and try to apply it to George Foulkes in general going forward.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel