BORIS Johnson’s “Brexit Freedoms” Bill poses a direct threat to the powers of the Scottish Parliament, the deputy first minister has warned.
Downing Street is bringing forward plans which will make it easier to amend EU law as part of a drive which it claims – without evidence – will “cut £1 billion of red tape” for UK businesses.
Scottish and Welsh ministers have raised the alarm over the proposals, which they say they were not consulted on.
Scottish Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson warned: "If these proposals involve changing the law in devolved policy areas, then pressing ahead without the consent of the Scottish Parliament would demonstrate yet again the UK Government’s intent to undermine devolution.”
Deputy FM John Swinney, speaking to BBC Radio Scotland, pointed to briefings in the past fortnight that Johnson was seeking to improve inter-governmental relations with the devolved administrations. According to reports, the PM is implementing a new communications structure designed to strengthen ties with Holyrood, the Senedd and Stormont.
But Swinney suggested those plans were already in tatters by Saturday morning, when Robertson held a brief call with the UK Attorney General Suella Braverman.
The deputy FM said the plan for a “Brexit Freedoms” Bill was “announced to us”. He added: “No prior consultation, no engagement, no dialogue, no enhancement of the way in which the administrations work together. So the stories that were run a couple of weeks ago are totally meaningless.”
Swinney said Robertson was “summoned” to the Saturday morning meeting to be “told what is going to be happening”. He continued: “With the danger, which has been set out by our counterparts in Wales as well, that the powers of the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly may well be undermined as a consequence of the decision.”
The SNP minister rejected suggestions that the new Bill could help “streamline” and improve governance in Scotland by cutting “red tape”. He insisted there wasn’t a “scrap of evidence” to support that claim.
READ MORE: Reopen talks with the EU over post-Brexit trade, Scotland to tell UK Government
Swinney added: “If you want evidence about the undermining of the Scottish Parliament, have a look at the Internal Market Bill, which is already on the statute book. Designed by the UK Government to use the excuse of Brexit to undermine the powers of the Scottish Parliament. That’s the reality of the threat to devolution that we face today.”
He concluded: “We’ll take forward discussions with the UK Government but the public in Scotland need to be aware of the very direct threat there is to the powers of the Scottish Parliament from the actions of the UK Government.”
The “Brexit Freedoms” Bill will affect the handling of retained EU law – Brussels-made regulations which were preserved in the UK statute book for legal continuity after the Brexit transition period ended in 2020.
The UK Government has previously made clear that it intends to eventually amend, replace or repeal all of the retained law that it deems “not right for the UK”. But Downing Street said that under current rules, changing or scrapping regulations in the pipeline of outdated legislation would take “several years” because of a comprehensive alteration process.
It said primary legislation is needed for many changes, even if “minor and technical”.
Downing Street claims the new Bill will “ensure that changes can be made more easily”, so the UK can “capitalise on Brexit freedoms more quickly”. It did not specify exactly what provisions the Bill will contain to speed up reforms, or how it calculated that businesses would save £1bn through the cutting of red tape.
Meanwhile, the Welsh government sought assurances that the new legislation wouldn't represent a "power grab".
Speaking on BBC Radio Wales, Welsh counsel general and constitution minister Mick Antoniw expressed concerns that the Bill might lead to reductions in farming and fishing standards, as well as environmental protections.
"We want to engage with the UK Government constructively," he said. "We want to ensure it doesn't become a Westminster power grab."
Boris Johnson claimed that, while the UK will not diverge from the EU rulebook “for the sake of it”, the legislation will help secure investment in cutting-edge technologies.
“There are things we can do differently and we think in a way that will encourage business to invest even more,” the Prime Minister told broadcasters during a visit to Tilbury Docks.
“In all the areas where the UK is strong – cyber, artificial intelligence, all the cutting-edge technologies of the future – we are going to make sure we do things differently and better, where appropriate.
“We won’t diverge for the sake of it but we are going to make sure this the number one place to do business and invest because of the freedoms that we have.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel