ASYLUM seekers have spoken out over brutal living conditions in the ageing military barracks used by the Home Office to house refugees.
People living in Napier Barracks in Kent – many of whom risked death in the English Channel to get to the UK – sleep in 20-bed dormitories separated by curtains. They say they feel like they are in a “prison” and are at risk of being infected with coronavirus.
The military site in Folkestone dates back more than 130 years and its use to house asylum seekers has been fiercely criticised by campaigners, particularly following a major outbreak of coronavirus last year.
As the Home Office prepares to use another military base in nearby Manston to process asylum seekers, the PA news agency heard from a number of Napier residents who spoke of poor conditions and safety fears.
The Home Office says it has made significant improvements to Napier in the last year and expects high standards from its providers.
One man who has lived at the barracks for six weeks said: “I can tell you Napier camp it’s a very bad place for living.
“You don’t have a room alone, you can’t go outside for a long time. It’s very bad because you think it is a prison.”
He said he does not feel safe from Covid-19 at the barracks, adding: “Every time, there are three or four buildings in the camp in quarantine.”
Another who had been there for five weeks said the site is old and unclean.
He added: “It is not safe because we have no doors – we are always at risk.”
READ MORE: Home Office has created 'parallel world' in Scottish hotels for asylum seekers
One man who arrived at Napier Barracks in the past two weeks said staff and security were friendly and polite. But he added that bathrooms are “dirty” and said he does not feel safe in relation to Covid-19.
Others spoke about difficulty sleeping in the busy dormitories.
However, many said the food was good, particularly compared to that available in hotels used to house asylum seekers.
One former resident, who was moved out of the barracks towards the end of 2021 after living there for 10 weeks, said: “The conditions of the camp are good in terms of amenities and good food. I did not have a Covid problem. It was safe.”
Clare Moseley, founder of refugee charity Care4Calais which has supported people living in Napier Barracks since it opened, said: “Accommodation at Napier remains far from ideal but the effects have been mitigated by limiting the amount of time that people stay there.
“Institutional accommodation that is set far from local communities can never be the right place for people who have come to the UK in need of safety. It is essential that they can access healthcare, faith centres and other amenities, and integrate within society.”
A Home Office spokesperson said: “We provide safe accommodation for asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute, including 24/7 access to healthcare.
“We have made significant improvements to Napier Barracks in the last year and continue to do so, including more recreational and outdoor activities, additional coronavirus tests and reduced capacity.
“Our New Plan for Immigration will overhaul the broken asylum system. We will welcome people through safe and legal routes whilst preventing abuse of the system.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here