BORIS Johnson attempted to defend himself from attacks over the findings of the Sue Gray report by apparently falsely insinuating Keir Starmer was responsible for Jimmy Savile never being prosecuted.
The Prime Minister said Keir Starmer had spent his time as director of public prosecutions “prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile”.
The claim comes from right-wing talking points shared online which falsely claim Starmer while head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) had stopped Savile from being prosecuted.
Ash Sarkar, contributing editor of Novara Media, said Johnson was “parroting far right attack lines cribbed straight from Telegram”. Telegram has been called right-wing extremists’ “new favourite platform”.
“Failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile” - the Prime Minister parroting far right attack lines cribbed straight from Telegram in the House of Commons.
— Ash Sarkar (@AyoCaesar) January 31, 2022
While Starmer was the head of the CPS when it decided against charging Savile, he was not directly involved in the case, which was handled by Surrey Police and a CPS reviewing lawyer.
Surrey Police in 2007 and 2008 investigated three complaints that Saville had sexually abused young girls. It led to Savile being interviewed under caution but not arrested and police decided not to charge the former BBC presenter because none of the victims were “prepared to support any police action”, including testifying in court.
READ MORE: Sue Gray report: Ian Blackford KICKED OUT of House of Commons after Boris Johnson criticism
Since Savile’s death in 2011, it emerged he had sexually abused hundreds of children and women.
In 2013, Starmer commissioned Alison Levitt QC to investigate the CPS’s decision not to prosecute Savile. She said the police’s approach to the investigation made the women reluctant to give evidence and help prosecutors.
Starmer admitted there were “errors in judgement” and apologised for “shortcomings” in the investigation. The CPS’s guidance on prosecuting child sex abuse was updated as a result.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson clearly 'misled' parliament with 'serial failures of leadership', FM says
Following a statement from the Prime Minister on the findings of Sue Gray’s report on lockdown-busting gatherings in Downing Street, Starmer said Johnson had “routinely” broken the rules, taking the public “for fools”.
He added: “He held peoples’ sacrifice in contempt and proved himself unfit for office.”
Johnson attacked Starmer, calling him “a former director of public prosecutions, who spent more time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile”.
He added: “He used this moment to prejudge a police inquiry. He’s reached his conclusions about it, I’m not going to come to any conclusions, it would be completely wrong to do so.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel