NADINE Dorries’s defence of Boris Johnson has been branded “a disaster” following the release of Sue Gray’s update on the partygate scandal.
The Culture Secretary came out to bat for the Prime Minister after a bruising session in the Commons in which he was pilloried from all benches.
But she dismissed all criticism and even defended her boss for regurgitating a debunked conspiracy theory about Keir Starmer.
Johnson sparked outrage in the Commons after accusing the Labour leader, while he was head of Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), of failing to prosecute disgraced former TV presenter Jimmy Savile.
After such claims circulated last year, a fact-check by the Reuters news agency concluded there was “no evidence” Starmer was “directly involved in the decision not to prosecute Jimmy Savile”.
Full Fact added that an official investigation which Starmer commissioned criticised both prosecutors and police for their handling of the allegations.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson 'parrots far-right attacks' on Keir Starmer with Jimmy Savile line
Quizzed about her boss spreading “fake news” by Channel 4, Dorries gave a series of bullish responses in an interview which went viral on social media.
The Tory minister ultimately insisted that “the Prime Minister tells the truth”.
READ MORE: Blackford stands by Johnson comments: 'I’ve stood up for my constituents'
Dorries was also criticised for her performance on Sky News. The Culture Secretary accused a journalist of spouting “pure fiction” and “guess work” in their analysis of the Sue Gray report – despite the fact the Sky reporter was quoting from the report itself.
"I would like to just deal with the facts if that's ok".
— Sky News (@SkyNews) January 31, 2022
Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries disputes journalists' interpretation of Sue Gray's report.
The 12-page document had 'some quite useful, accurate, observations and recommendations', she adds.https://t.co/Xf6o9u0kaR pic.twitter.com/7JYVNpLfDT
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson close to tears explaining her 'upset' at Boris Johnson's leadership
Responding to the Channel 4 performance, SNP MP Pete Wishart commented: “There is never any way that getting Nadine Dorries out to ‘defend’ you could ever be anything other than a disaster. This is something else.”
Party colleague John Nicolson added: “Disgraceful. Nadine Dorries is not fit for office. And frighteningly #disinformation falls within my opposite number’s brief.”
Sharing the video on his Twitter profile, Scottish Culture Secretary Angus Robertson referenced comments by Dorries about changing the funding model for public broadcasters.
"Disappointed that I won’t be meeting Nadine Dorries today as planned," he posted. "I was intending to tell her to stop undermining public service TV that broadcasts important interviews like this."
Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab has since defended Johnson for repeating the discredited Savile claim in the Commons.
Asked if he would withdraw the Tory leader's claim, Raab told Times Radio: “It’s not for me to do that. What I would say is it’s part of the cut and thrust in the Chamber.”
Johnson also accused the Labour frontbench of drug taking during the parliamentary debate.
A Labour MP said: "Part four of Sue Gray's report says that there is a culture of excessive consumption of alcohol which is not appropriate. Is there also a culture excessive drug taking in Downing Street?"
Prompting gasps in the chamber, the PM replied: "Any drug taking would be excessive and perhaps he should direct that question to the Labour front bench."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel