ALISTER Jack has refused to distance himself from the Prime Minister’s bizarre Jimmy Savile claim adding it is part of the “cut and thrust of politics” at Westminster.
The Scotland Secretary was given the opportunity to weigh in on Johnson’s despatch box attack on Keir Starmer, where he alleged the now-Labour leader stopped Savile being prosecuted as a paedophile during his time as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).
Starmer was not involved directly in the handling of Savile’s case, instead Surrey Police and a CPS reviewing lawyer looked into a number of allegations in 2007 and 2008.
READ MORE: Tory MSP Stephen Kerr left red-faced in row over 'Trumpian' Voter ID laws
Savile was arrested and interviewed under caution for the complaints of sexual abuse against young girls, but police didn’t charge him as his victims allegedly felt unable to testify.
The PM’s remark has caused outrage as many claim Johnson was “parroting right wing attack lines” against Starmer, and that he was spreading disinformation.
Johnson made the comments at the start of a marathon two hour questioning session from MPs over the Sue Gray report into lockdown breaking gatherings at Number 10.
And now, senior Scottish Tory Jack declined to criticise the Prime Minister when asked about the Savile statement.
Speaking on ITV Border, Jack (pictured) said: “I mean I’m not going to comment on the remarks regarding Jimmy Savile as I simply don’t know the details of when Starmer was the director of prosecutions…”
Political editor Peter MacMahon interjected: “But Secretary of State I don’t mean to interrupt too much but that was a very serious allegation made at the despatch box by the Prime Minister about someone who was knighted for his services to public prosecution, now the leader of the Labour Party.
“Your former colleague said it was a smear and you don't seem to have an opinion on that?”
READ MORE: Omicron subvariant BA.2 cases confirmed in Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon says
Jack replied: “Well, because I don't know, I'm not going to judge because as I said, I don't know the detail of what happened back then.
“So I'm not going to get involved in that disagreement.
“You know, I hear from all sides of the chamber people that say things that I would say in my own mind think were a smear, but that's the cut and thrust of politics at Westminster it’s a very adversarial chamber, and things that you know, well, that's how it is and as to whether or not the remark was valid, that's for others to judge.”
SNP, Labour and some Tory MPs have called on the UK Government to retract the claim - but no ministers have so far come forward to do so.
NEW: Alister Jack declines to distance himself from Boris Johnson's unfounded accusation Sir Keir Starmer failed to prosecute Jimmy Savile.
— Representing Border (@ITVBorderRB) February 1, 2022
The Scottish Secretary says the claim was 'part of the cut and thrust of politics' pic.twitter.com/UFQs7miJKV
However, Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries and Justice Secretary Dominic Raab both entertained the plausibility of the accusations instead.
Dorries made headlines on Monday evening after insisting “the Prime Minister tells the truth” amid criticism of the Savile comments.
It comes as Savile’s victims are said to be “universally appalled and disgusted” by Johnson’s comment in the Commons.
READ MORE: 'Inoperable ulcer': Council row erupts over offensive 'mud throwing' in castle battle
Richard Scorer, head of abuse and public inquiries at law firm Slater and Gordon, said many of the victims he represented feel the PM is "using" them to climb out of a "political hole".
Speaking to the Mirror, Scorer said: "[The victims] are universally appalled and disgusted by those remarks and want him to apologise.
"They also feel he should withdraw those remarks."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel