BORIS Johnson is facing renewed calls to stand down as a second senior minister distanced himself from his controversial attack on Sir Keir Starmer and another adviser quit No 10.
The beleaguered Prime Minister, under fire over lockdown parties in Whitehall, sought to rally Downing Street staff with a line from The Lion King, telling them “Change is good”.
But he was hit with a fifth resignation in less than 24 hours when Elena Narozanski, a special adviser in the No 10 policy unit, walked out.
Health Secretary Sajid Javid made clear he disagreed with Johnson’s attack on Starmer when he accused the Labour leader of failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile when he was director of public prosecutions.
READ MORE: 'Desperate' Boris Johnson promises more power to MPs as he tries to avoid ousting
And backbencher Aaron Bell became the latest Tory MP to declare publicly that they have submitted a letter calling for a vote of no confidence in their leader.
In a statement, he said: “The breach of trust that events in No 10 Downing Street represent, and the manner in which they have been handled, makes his position untenable.”
In an emotional intervention in the Commons on Monday following the publication of the Sue Gray report into lockdown parties, Bell asked Johnson if he thought he was a “fool” for following Covid restrictions at his grandmother’s funeral.
Other Tory MPs are expected to consider over the weekend whether to write to the chairman of the 1922 Committee Sir Graham Brady in an attempt to force a leadership contest.
The statement posted by Conservative MP Aaron Bell, who said he has submitted a letter of no confidence in Boris Johnson (Aaron Bell/PA)
In an apparent move to head off further dissent, Johnson has written to Tory MPs promising them a greater role in policy-making with a “direct line” into No 10.
The latest turmoil was triggered by the shock resignation on Thursday of Johnson’s long-standing policy chief Munira Mirza over his refusal to withdraw his “scurrilous” accusation about Starmer.
Speaking on Friday, Javid indicated that he agreed with Chancellor Rishi Sunak who said he would not have made those remarks.
“Keir Starmer, when he was running the DPP, did a good job and he should be respected for it. It is a tough job and he deserved absolute respect for that,” he told reporters.
Javid acknowledged Johnson had subsequently “clarified” his comments and insisted the Prime Minister still had his full support.
However, his intervention will only fuel speculation over how much support the Prime Minister really enjoys from members of his top team.
Munira Mirza (Yui Mok/PA)
Mirza’s resignation was followed by the announcement that three more of the most senior figures in No 10 – chief of staff Dan Rosenfield, principal private secretary Martin Reynolds and director of communications Jack Doyle – were also leaving.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesperson said the departures had all been agreed before Mirza tendered her resignation and that they were leaving by mutual consent.
All three were to some extent implicated in the controversy over parties during lockdown.
Reynolds organised the notorious “bring your own booze” event in the Downing Street garden while Doyle was reportedly at at least one of the gatherings now under investigation by the police.
WATCH: Partygate scandal translated for US audience in hilarious New York Times video
While Rosenfield did not join until after most of the events had taken place, he has been criticised over the Government’s initial response to the report that there had been no breach of the rules.
Energy minister Greg Hands said the Prime Minister was “taking charge” after promising sweeping changes in No 10 in response to Gray’s findings.
“The Prime Minister was absolutely clear on Monday that there would be changes at the top of No 10 and that is what he has delivered,” he told Sky News.
“The Sue Gray report update said that there were failings at the top of the operation. This is the Prime Minister taking charge.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel