A SENIOR Tory MP and former minister has said it is time for Boris Johnson to go, and written a letter of no confidence in the Prime Minister, according to reports.
Nick Gibb, who served as an education minister under three consecutive Tory prime ministers, called on Johnson to resign amid reports he was pictured holding a beer at a Covid restriction-busting gathering.
Gibb suggested Johnson had not been truthful in his explanations of parties reportedly held in No 10 and across Whitehall during Covid measures.
The MP for Bognor Regis and Littlehampton, who is reported to have submitted a no-confidence letter to Sir Graham Brady, brings the number of Tory MPs who have now publicly called for Johnson to resign to 15.
READ MORE: WATCH: Partygate scandal translated for US audience in hilarious New York Times video
Privately, the number is expected to be higher. Some reports have put the number of no-confidence letters to Brady as high as 40-44. A total of 54 is needed to trigger a leadership challenge, but the number will remain secret until that threshold is reached.
Writing in The Telegraph, Gibb said that the Conservative Party must face the “hard truths”, and added: “To restore trust, we need to change the Prime Minister.”
He is a respected and well connected figure in the Tory party. His brother, Robbie Gibb, is a former No 10 head of communications and current BBC board member for England.
Gibb's (below) intervention comes as The Mirror reported that the Metropolitan Police had been handed a photograph of Johnson holding a beer at an alleged gathering in June 2020 to mark the Prime Minister’s birthday.
The newspaper said it was one of the 300 photos handed to the Met in their investigation into 12 alleged gatherings that may have broken Covid restrictions.
The photo is reported to have also included Chancellor Rishi Sunak, holding a soft drink.
No 10 said it could not comment while the Met Police’s investigation was ongoing.
The Treasury was contacted for comment but Sunak has previously said he was in the room for a Covid meeting.
On Friday, the beleaguered Prime Minister sought to rally Downing Street staff with a line from The Lion King, telling them “change is good” after the departure of a number of aides.
He was hit with a fifth resignation in less than 24 hours when Elena Narozanski, a special adviser in the No 10 policy unit, walked out on Friday.
Health Secretary Sajid Javid made clear he disagreed with Johnson’s attack on Sir Keir Starmer when he accused the Labour leader of failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile when he was director of public prosecutions.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer, Jimmy Savile, and Boris Johnson's 'move towards disinformation'
Backbencher Aaron Bell also declared publicly he had submitted a letter calling for a vote of no confidence in his leader.
In a statement, he said: “The breach of trust that events in No 10 Downing Street represent, and the manner in which they have been handled, makes his position untenable.”
In an emotional question in the Commons on Monday following the publication of the Sue Gray report into lockdown parties, Bell asked Johnson if he thought he was a “fool” for following Covid restrictions at his grandmother’s funeral.
In his intervention, Gibb said Bell had been “brave” and “struck a chord”.
He wrote: “He expressed the anger and frustration of millions at rule-breaking by those most responsible for making the rules.
“He was not a fool for sticking by those rules. But, whether inadvertently or not, behaviour by people at the heart of government suggests that they think he was – or worse still, that the rules don’t apply to them.”
He said his constituents were “furious about the double standards”.
Gibb said: “The Prime Minister accepted the resignation of Allegra Stratton for joking about a Christmas party that she hadn’t attended, but he won’t take responsibility for those that he did attend.
“I am sorry to say that it is hard to see how it can be the case that the Prime Minister told the truth.”
Other Tory MPs are expected to consider over the weekend whether to write to the chairman of the 1922 Committee in an attempt to force a leadership contest.
In an apparent move to head off further dissent, Johnson has written to Tory MPs promising them a greater role in policymaking with a “direct line” into No 10.
The latest turmoil was triggered by the shock resignation on Thursday of Johnson’s long-standing policy chief Munira Mirza (below) over his refusal to withdraw his “scurrilous” accusation about Starmer.
Speaking on Friday, Javid indicated that he agreed with Chancellor Rishi Sunak, who said he would not have made those remarks.
“Keir Starmer, when he was running the DPP, did a good job and he should be respected for it. It is a tough job and he deserved absolute respect for that,” he told reporters.
Javid acknowledged Johnson had subsequently “clarified” his comments and insisted the Prime Minister still had his full support.
However, his intervention will only fuel speculation over how much support the Prime Minister really enjoys from members of his top team.
Mirza’s resignation was followed by the announcement that three more of the most senior figures in No 10 – chief of staff Dan Rosenfield, principal private secretary Martin Reynolds and director of communications Jack Doyle – were also leaving.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesperson said the departures had all been agreed before Mirza tendered her resignation and that they were leaving by mutual consent.
All three were to some extent implicated in the controversy over parties during lockdown.
Reynolds organised the notorious “bring your own booze” event in the Downing Street garden while Doyle was reportedly at at least one of the gatherings now under investigation by the police.
While Rosenfield did not join until after most of the events had taken place, he has been criticised over the Government’s initial response to the report that there had been no breach of the rules.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel