BORIS Johnson appeared to ignore calls to scrap a hike in National Insurance contributions as he was grilled by MPs.
SNP leader Ian Blackford called for the Prime Minister to scrap the tax rather than “scrapping” with the Chancellor over the Tory leadership.
Nurses’ wages would be hit, on average, by an effective cut because of the increase, Blackford claimed.
The Prime Minister’s mini-reshuffle was slammed by the SNP leader, who called it “changing the deck chairs”, while people “continued to be punished by the cost of living crisis”.
READ MORE: Cost of living protest to target UK Government's Edinburgh HQ this weekend
National Insurance contributions will rocket at the same time as energy costs are set to soar, Blackford claimed, and noted the “energy he [Johnson] can sum up to save his own skin” in reference to some shock sackings – including that of Jacob Rees-Mogg as Leader of the House.
Blackford asked are the “Prime Minister and his Chancellor seriously telling those nurses that their reward for seeing us through the pandemic is a £270 wage cut?”
He said nurses are the “very backbone of the National Health Service, the very people that he’s hitting with the pay cut in April”.
Blackford added: “At the same time that those nurses were going into work every day to fight the pandemic, 16 different parties were happening in his Government. The public know what nurses sacrificed during the pandemic, and they know exactly what this rule-breaking Prime Minister and his Government were up to.”
The Prime Minister would not be drawn on scrapping plans to increase National Insurance contributions, choosing instead to claim “record numbers” of nurses were currently in training across the UK.
Johnson said: “We back nurses all the way.
“What they want is more nurses. We have 11,000 more in the NHS this year than there were last year.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson photographed with open 'bottle of bubbly' in new partygate picture
“Those are fantastic investments in our country and society.”
Meanwhile, Keir Starmer branded the Chancellor a "loan shark" over his measures to mitigate the cost of living crisis.
The opposition leader denounced the Government’s energy bills announcement as a “dodgy loan, not a proper plan”.
He said: “Talking of scams, households are going to have to fork out an extra £19 billion on their energy bills. The Government is insulting people’s intelligence by pretending it’s giving them a discount, but it’s not, it’s a con. A buy now, pay later scheme, a dodgy loan, not a proper plan.
He added: “When his donors give him cash to fund his lifestyle and tell him he has to pay it all back later, are they giving him a loan or a discount?”
Prime Minister Boris Johnson replied: “Our plan to tackle the cost of living is faster, more efficient and more generous than anything that they have set out.
“We’ve lifted the Living Wage by record amounts, we’ve cut the effective tax for people on Universal Credit and we’re now setting out a fantastic plan to help people with the cost of energy, and it is more generous and more effective than anything Labour have set out.
“It’s £9.1 billion, huge sums that we’re using to help people across the country and the only reason we can afford it is because we have a strong economy, the fastest growing in the G7.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here