A TORY minister has said “no decisions by the regulators have been taken” on six North Sea oil and gas fields which were reported to be set for a green light.
But opposition MPs accused the Government of “tanking efforts” to meet global climate targets, and said allowing further gas and oil exploration would be “flying in the face” of its carbon commitments.
Energy minister Greg Hands said: “The fields referenced in these reports are already licensed, some dating back to as early as 1970 and are now going through the usual regulatory processes.
“All proposals are subject to a rigorous scrutiny process prior to consent, as opposed to licensing, by our expert regulators, including an environmental impact assessment and a public consultation.”
He added: “Continued support for Britain’s oil and gas sector is not just compatible with our net zero goals, it is essential if we’re to meet the ambitious targets we’ve set for ourselves while protecting jobs and livelihoods.”
READ MORE: 70 per cent of Scots worried about paying for soaring energy bills
The Telegraph reported earlier in the week that six North Sea oil and gas fields are set to be given the green light this year.
Asking an urgent question in the House of Commons, Green MP Caroline Lucas called for a Commons vote on any recommendations to the Oil and Gas Authority that undermine climate commitments.
She noted global commitments to keep global warming to 1.5C and that the UK still holds the Cop presidency, and asked “why is he ignoring that and giving the green light to the extraction of more oil and gas?”
The MP for Brighton Pavilion added: “Can he confirm if he and his Government are actually still committed to net zero by 2050 and the interim targets? Because frankly judging by their actions that seems to be in question”.
She asked: “Will he agree that any Government recommendation to the Oil and Gas Authority that undermines the House of Commons’ formal declaration of a climate emergency, as well as our international climate obligations, should at the very least be subject to a parliamentary vote in this House?”
Liberal Democrat MP for Bath, Wera Hobhouse, said: “Granting new oil and gas exploration in the North Sea is flying in the face of the Government’s commitment to get to net zero.”
And Labour’s Kerry McCarthy, MP for Bristol East, said: “The UK Government is tanking efforts to keep us to 1.5C by approving these six new oilfields.”
READ MORE: 'A slap in the face': BP profits hit eight-year high as energy bills soar
Labour shadow climate change minister Alan Whitehead said: “The Government is thrashing around over what we know is now a decade of failure on energy and particularly the transition to a low carbon energy economy.”
“We need a phased and just transition in the North Sea”, he said, but added the test of that should ask whether actions are “compatible with keeping global warming to 1.5C”.
Hands, responding to Hobhouse, said: “Whatever she may read in the Daily Telegraph, these are actually not new licences, these are how the licence gets processed.”
The minister said the Government is working with the industry to “transform” jobs and the energy supply, adding: “It is a transition, not an attempt… to close down the sector, which I think is what the Green Party is calling for.”
He said: “These are fields that have already been licensed. So that has been taken into account, for example, in our net zero strategy, and also in terms of our carbon budgets coming up.”
The minister added: “This is not in itself a debate between gas or renewables. The debate here in front of us if whether we get the gas we currently need from the UK continental shelf or import it from abroad.”
He said: “We are committed to a decarbonised power sector, so long as it’s consistent with security of supply, by the year 2035, as well as being consistent, obviously, with the net zero strategy and the UK getting to net zero by 2050.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel