Nicola Sturgeon said she is not “ideologically opposed” to a windfall tax on oil and gas, but said the north-east of Scotland must not be left to bear "the brunt" of such a proposal.
Instead, the First Minister suggested that "companies making massive profits and with the broadest shoulders should be playing a part in contributing to helping families the length and breadth of the UK".
She said there was "no doubt" that this should be the case.
Labour proposed a one-off tax on energy companies, some of which made multibillion-pound profits last year, but the SNP did not vote when the proposals were put before MPs.
READ MORE: No new money for Scotland or Wales despite Treasury's claim, devolved leaders say
Referring to Labour's position on indyref2, the First Minister responded: "Those that are arguing for me to somehow make the case for a windfall tax are the very people ... who want to deny Scottish governments the powers to actually look at these things with the possibility of doing them."
She went on: “I was questioned last week about the idea of a windfall levy on energy companies. I’m not ideologically opposed to that.
“I don’t have the powers to do it. If the UK Government comes forward with a proposal like that, I would encourage them to think about all options.
“And my only request is that we don’t want to see only the north-east of Scotland bearing the brunt of what we need to do to deal with the cost of living crisis.
“But there’s no doubt that companies making massive profits and with the broadest shoulders here should be playing a part in contributing to helping families the length and breadth of the UK.”
Sturgeon said a windfall tax is one option that the UK Government should be looking at, but she was focused on what the Scottish Government could do in its budget to mitigate the cost of living crisis.
Last week, Ofgem announced the energy price cap would rise by £693, raising fears that soaring energy prices as well as the National Insurance hike could squeeze family budgets.
“I think the UK Government should be looking at options like this,” the First Minister said.
“The most important thing for me, and I’ll be considering later today with Kate Forbes what we announce in the budget tomorrow to provide support in Scotland to people who are hard-pressed right now.
“Now, the most important thing is we get money to families and individuals who need it and what the Chancellor announced last week in my view doesn’t yet go far enough.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel