THE SNP and Greens are set to work together on a joint prospectus for Scottish independence ahead of a 2023 vote, it has been revealed.
Speaking to The Herald, Green co-leader and Government minister Lorna Slater said that the two parties would be drawing up an agreed prospectus, while also putting together separate documents.
The two parties currently operate in government under a co-operation agreement deal, which was signed off last summer. As part of that, it was agreed that legislation for a second referendum would be drawn up. Both parties’ manifestoes included a pledge to indyref2 being held in this parliament.
Speaking this week, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon pledged to do “everything in her power” to give Scots the chance to vote on the country’s future in 2023.
She said the date legislation would be introduced to enable Scotland to hold the independence referendum would be announced “when we’ve taken the detailed decisions”.
She told STV’s Scotland Tonight: “What I think is much more exciting as we come out, I hope, of the pandemic, and certainly the acute phase of the pandemic, are the opportunities that come with Scotland being independent.”
In The Herald interview, marking the six-month anniversary of the Bute House agreement between the SNP and Greens, Slater explained: "There will be more than one prospectus for independence. The Scottish Greens will develop a prospectus for independence but as part of the Scottish Government we will also contribute to the Scottish Government's prospectus.
"It's clear from the Bute House agreement and from our manifestos that there are many places where the Scottish Greens and the SNP agree, but many places where we disagree and that's why the Bute House agreement includes the excluded items.
"I would expect to help shape that government manifesto. It wouldn't fully encapsulate a Green vision for Scotland, so the Scottish Greens will produce our own Green vision for Scotland."
Pressed on the 2023 timetable for indyref2, Slater, Minister for Green Skills, Circular Economy and Biodiversity, said: "That is certainly the plan, that's the vision for it, that's what we are committed to. The Greens said this term of parliament. We're saying next year is a good year.
"It's an exciting time. I am really looking forward to having that conversation about what kind of Scotland we want to be and to setting out that vision."
However, Scottish Tory constitution spokesperson Donald Cameron expressed his anger over the plans and accused the Greens of being “extremist”.
“The Greens have already shown their influence on SNP ministers by getting them to harden their stance on oil and gas and ramping up their war on motorists,” he said.
“The last thing our recovery needs is the anti-jobs, anti-business Greens being heavily involved in attempts to break up the Union.”
And his Scottish Labour counterpart Sarah Boyack also attacked the parties. “We came together to beat Covid and now they want us to take us back to fighting with each other,” she claimed.
“This is a total dereliction of duty in the middle of a growing cost of living crisis.”
READ MORE: Douglas Ross doesn't have the facts on Moray mobile banking during committee session
It comes after Labour’s shadow Scotland secretary wrote to the UK Government demanding they stop Holyrood civil servants from working on independence.
As a freedom of information request revealed there are 11 civil servants working on the Government’s independence prospectus, Ian Murray claimed this was a “wasteful use of taxpayers’ money” and told Cabinet Secretary Simon Case to reverse the plans.
“The Scottish National Party is of course perfectly entitled to set out its plans for separation, but Scottish taxpayers should not be expected to foot the bill for a prospectus which the majority have already rejected in a national referendum,” he wrote in the letter.
But the Scottish Government defended itself against his intervention, commenting: “It is the role of the civil service to support the elected government of the day in developing and implementing its policies.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel