BORIS Johnson is being urged not to “force the hand” of devolved administrations by ending free coronavirus testing across the UK at the end of February.
Health Secretary Humza Yousaf said the UK Government has the right to make decisions on testing in England but funding for the tests elsewhere should be maintained if devolved administrations want to continue.
It comes after Boris Johnson told MPs he is looking to end the requirement to self-isolate after a positive test by the end of February, a month earlier than scheduled.
Speaking to the BBC’s Sunday Show, Yousaf said the UK’s four chief medical officers have been working together to discuss the removal of restrictions.
He said he is concerned that he has not seen the public health advice around the Prime Minister’s announcement.
The Health Secretary said: “This is the central argument we’ve been trying to make with the UK Government since the announcement on Wednesday – which is, you have every right to make decisions for people in England, but what they can’t do and shouldn’t do is then force our hand when it comes to our response.”
READ MORE: Boris Johnson's plan to end isolation rules a ‘gamble’, says disease expert
He continued: “I don’t know the detail of what the UK Government’s going to announce, but if they are going to, for example, withdraw the universal offer for testing – which I don’t think they should do at the end of February – if they do that, then of course tests, as you know, are procured on a four-nations basis.
“And that could effectively force our hand to respond in a way we don’t want to do at this immediate time.”
Under this scenario, he said the Scottish Government would have to set up its own procurement for tests and potentially find the money from elsewhere.
Yousaf was also asked about waiting times in the Scottish NHS and when they will start to come down.
His counterpart in the UK Government, Sajid Javid, has admitted that the number of people waiting will continue to rise for another two years.
He said: “I commend Sajid Javid for his honesty, because that’s absolutely right.
“It isn’t going to be a case that I can promise you waiting less for be abolished or finished and we’ll work our way through them completely within a few months or even a year.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel