SCOTLAND’S Crofting Commission is dysfunctional with “unacceptable weakness” in its leadership, a Holyrood committee has warned.
Auditor General for Scotland Stephen Boyle found “significant weaknesses in the commission’s leadership and governance” in his examination of the regulator last year.
Holyrood’s Public Audit Committee has now said it is extremely concerned by the significant and persistent problems within the organisation responsible for overseeing Scotland’s 20,000 crofts.
In a report published today, the committee concluded that neither the Crofting Commission nor the Scottish Government had acted on concerns raised back in 2016, while there has been a critical breakdown in trust between the organisation’s board and its chief executive.
“We find the weaknesses in leadership and governance identified by the Auditor General for Scotland at the Crofting Commission to be unacceptable,” the report said.
READ MORE: Crofting market 'out of control' with young people and locals priced out
The committee found that despite the Government giving evidence that it is “aware that there were some tensions between the board and the staff”, MSPs found it was not “sufficiently alive to the seriousness of the governance issues”.
Following the Audit Scotland report, Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon said: “We are working closely with the Crofting Commission and its board to address the issues raised within the report.
“We will, of course, consider carefully and address any matters relating to the Scottish Government and its sponsorship of the Crofting Commission.
“The commission will publish an improvement plan shortly and we will continue to work closely with it on implementation of the plan and in delivering core activities.”
Problems include uncertainty about roles and relationships within the organisation that has caused the board to have a lack of confidence in the Crofting Commission chief executive and has “contributed to a significant breakdown of trust”.
Committee convener Richard Leonard said: “It is incredibly disappointing that neither the Scottish Government nor the Crofting Commission took sufficient action to avoid the recurrence of serious concerns first highlighted as far back as 2016.
“The committee remains gravely concerned that these issues will continue to recur unless, this time, lessons are learned and learned fast.
“We welcome the fact that there is now an action plan in place to turn things around but what we are also demanding is a culture change.
“When the new board is elected next month, it must forge strong relationships with the Scottish Government and steer clear of the day-to-day running of the commission – instead focusing on being transparent, open and accountable to the crofting communities they serve.”
The commission’s role is to regulate crofting and promote the interests of croft communities.
It is a non-departmental public body (NDPB) which operates on a day-to-day basis independently of the Government, but for which Scottish ministers are ultimately responsible.
In October, chief executive of the commission, Bill Barron, said: “Since the commission were made aware of the concerns from the auditors, we have worked exceptionally hard to make tangible and positive changes.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here